Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference Data
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has become a crucial step for aligning pretrained large language models (LLMs) using supervised datasets of input-output pairs. However, despite being supervised, SFT is inherently limited by its generative training objective. To address its limitations, the existing common strategy is to follow SFT with a separate phase of preference optimization (PO), which relies on either human-labeled preference data or a strong reward model to guide the learning process. In this paper, we address the limitations of SFT by exploring one of the most successful techniques in conventional supervised learning: discriminative learning. We introduce Discriminative Fine-Tuning (DFT), an improved variant of SFT, which mitigates the burden of collecting human-labeled preference data or training strong reward models. Unlike SFT that employs a generative approach and overlooks negative data, DFT adopts a discriminative paradigm that increases the probability of positive answers while suppressing potentially negative ones, aiming for data prediction instead of token prediction. Our contributions include: (i) a discriminative probabilistic framework for fine-tuning LLMs by explicitly modeling the discriminative likelihood of an answer among all possible outputs given an input; (ii) efficient algorithms to optimize this discriminative likelihood; and (iii) extensive experiments demonstrating DFT's effectiveness, achieving performance better than SFT and comparable to if not better than SFTrightarrowPO. The code can be found at https://github.com/Optimization-AI/DFT.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 52 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.
Builds on
52 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 17
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Bootstrapping Language Models with DPO Implicit Rewards14 Jun
- 2024Self-Play with Adversarial Critic: Provable and Scalable Offline Alignment for Language Models6 Jun
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms14 May
- 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study16 Apr
- 2024Binary Classifier Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment6 Apr
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive20 Feb
- 2024Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewards8 Feb
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
5 more
- 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Loss27 Dec
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment30 Jun
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions20 Dec
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 35
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
23 more
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
- 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 265
- 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
- 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 184
- 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 176
- 2023Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslationcited by 149
- 2022Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generationcited by 121
- 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 77
- 2023Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuningcited by 48
- 2024Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignmentcited by 32
- 2022Finite-Sum Coupled Compositional Stochastic Optimization: Theory and Applicationscited by 27
- 2024Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2023LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk Optimizationcited by 15
- 2024On Discriminative Probabilistic Modeling for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Preference-Oriented Supervised Fine-Tuning: Favoring Target Model Over Aligned Large Language Models
- 2024Intuitive Fine-Tuning: Towards Simplifying Alignment into a Single Process
- 2026Diversity in Large Language Models under Supervised Fine-Tuning
- 2025Self-Rewarding PPO: Aligning Large Language Models with Demonstrations Only
- 2025Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality
- 2024Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Need
- 2025Balancing the Budget: Understanding Trade-offs Between Supervised and Preference-Based Finetuning
- 2024HFT: Half Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models