mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Preference-Oriented Supervised Fine-Tuning: Favoring Target Model Over Aligned Large Language Models

arXiv 2412.12865 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2024cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Alignment, endowing a pre-trained Large language model (LLM) with the ability to follow instructions, is crucial for its real-world applications. Conventional supervised fine-tuning (SFT) methods formalize it as causal language modeling typically with a cross-entropy objective, requiring a large amount of high-quality instruction-response pairs. However, the quality of widely used SFT datasets can not be guaranteed due to the high cost and intensive labor for the creation and maintenance in practice. To overcome the limitations associated with the quality of SFT datasets, we introduce a novel preference-oriented supervised fine-tuning approach, namely PoFT. The intuition is to boost SFT by imposing a particular preference: textitfavoring the target model over aligned LLMs on the same SFT data. This preference encourages the target model to predict a higher likelihood than that predicted by the aligned LLMs, incorporating assessment information on data quality (i.e., predicted likelihood by the aligned LLMs) into the training process. Extensive experiments are conducted, and the results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. PoFT achieves stable and consistent improvements over the SFT baselines across different training datasets and base models. Moreover, we prove that PoFT can be integrated with existing SFT data filtering methods to achieve better performance, and further improved by following preference optimization procedures, such as DPO.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  2. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning25 Dec
  3. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  4. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment30 Jun

Other references · 19

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  6. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  8. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  9. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  10. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  11. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
  12. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
7 more
  1. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
  2. 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 369
  3. 2021ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Trainingcited by 339
  4. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  5. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
  6. 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
  7. 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PAFT: A Parallel Training Paradigm for Effective LLM Fine-Tuning
  2. 2024Intuitive Fine-Tuning: Towards Simplifying Alignment into a Single Process
  3. 2025Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality
  4. 2024ASFT: Aligned Supervised Fine-Tuning through Absolute Likelihood
  5. 2025Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference Data
  6. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model
  7. 2025Balancing the Budget: Understanding Trade-offs Between Supervised and Preference-Based Finetuning
  8. 2024A Preference-driven Paradigm for Enhanced Translation with Large Language Models