mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Perceptions to Decisions: Wildfire Evacuation Decision Prediction with Behavioral Theory-informed LLMs

arXiv 2502.17701 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.CYcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evacuation decision prediction is critical for efficient and effective wildfire response by helping emergency management anticipate traffic congestion and bottlenecks, allocate resources, and minimize negative impacts. Traditional statistical methods for evacuation decision prediction fail to capture the complex and diverse behavioral logic of different individuals. In this work, for the first time, we introduce FLARE, short for facilitating LLM for advanced reasoning on wildfire evacuation decision prediction, a Large Language Model (LLM)-based framework that integrates behavioral theories and models to streamline the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and subsequently integrate with memory-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) module to provide accurate evacuation decision prediction and understanding. Our proposed method addresses the limitations of using existing LLMs for evacuation behavioral predictions, such as limited survey data, mismatching with behavioral theory, conflicting individual preferences, implicit and complex mental states, and intractable mental state-behavior mapping. Experiments on three post-wildfire survey datasets show an average of 20.47% performance improvement over traditional theory-informed behavioral models, with strong cross-event generalizability. Our complete code is publicly available at https://github.com/SusuXu-s-Lab/FLARE

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.

Builds on

28 of 70 references.

References · 28

  1. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  3. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
  4. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 703
  5. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  6. 2024Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learningcited by 285
  7. 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 176
  8. 2023Understanding Social Reasoning in Language Models with Language Modelscited by 166
  9. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
  10. 2024Large Language Models Meet NLP: A Surveycited by 102
  11. 2023How FaR Are Large Language Models From Agents with Theory-of-Mind?cited by 75
  12. 2020A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and managementcited by 64
16 more
  1. 2024Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuningcited by 57
  2. 2023Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior?cited by 53
  3. 2024SimpleToM: Exposing the Gap between Explicit ToM Inference and Implicit ToM Application in LLMscited by 51
  4. 2024Large Language Models Assume People are More Rational than We Really arecited by 49
  5. 2024Can LLMs Speak For Diverse People? Tuning LLMs via Debate to Generate Controllable Controversial Statementscited by 33
  6. 2024Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models: In-Depth Analysis on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpuscited by 32
  7. 2024Limited Ability of LLMs to Simulate Human Psychological Behaviours: a Psychometric Analysiscited by 30
  8. 2024What Happened in LLMs Layers when Trained for Fast vs. Slow Thinking: A Gradient Perspectivecited by 29
  9. 2024CrisisSense-LLM: Instruction Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Multi-label Social Media Text Classification in Disaster Informaticscited by 25
  10. 2024Are Long-LLMs A Necessity For Long-Context Tasks?cited by 22
  11. 2024Do LLMs Exhibit Human-Like Reasoning? Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs for Open-Ended Responsescited by 22
  12. 2025Harnessing Large Language Models for Disaster Management: A Surveycited by 20
  13. 2024Language Models Trained to do Arithmetic Predict Human Risky and Intertemporal Choicecited by 10
  14. 2024Predicting and Understanding Human Action Decisions: Insights from Large Language Models and Cognitive Instance-Based Learningcited by 8
  15. 2021Estimating Wildfire Evacuation Decision and Departure Timing Using Large-Scale GPS Datacited by 5
  16. 2023Reinforcement Learning for Wildfire Mitigation in Simulated Disaster Environmentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 4.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PASM: Population Adaptive Symbolic Mixture-of-Experts Model for Cross-location Hurricane Evacuation Decision Prediction
  2. 2025FireScope: Wildfire Risk Raster Prediction with a Chain-of-Thought Oracle
  3. 2024WildfireGPT: Tailored Large Language Model for Wildfire Analysis
  4. 2025A Probabilistic Approach to Wildfire Spread Prediction Using a Denoising Diffusion Surrogate Model
  5. 2025Empowering LLM Agents with Geospatial Awareness: Toward Grounded Reasoning for Wildfire Response
  6. 2026Risk Is Not the Target: A Monotonic Framework for Evaluating Wildfire Operational Risk Signals
  7. 2025Generative AI as a Pillar for Predicting 2D and 3D Wildfire Spread: Beyond Physics-Based Models and Traditional Deep Learning
  8. 2025A RAG-Based Multi-Agent LLM System for Natural Hazard Resilience and Adaptation