mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Empowering LLM Agents with Geospatial Awareness: Toward Grounded Reasoning for Wildfire Response

arXiv 2510.12061 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2025cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Effective disaster response is essential for safeguarding lives and property. Existing statistical approaches often lack semantic context, generalize poorly across events, and offer limited interpretability. While Large language models (LLMs) provide few-shot generalization, they remain text-bound and blind to geography. To bridge this gap, we introduce a Geospatial Awareness Layer (GAL) that grounds LLM agents in structured earth data. Starting from raw wildfire detections, GAL automatically retrieves and integrates infrastructure, demographic, terrain, and weather information from external geodatabases, assembling them into a concise, unit-annotated perception script. This enriched context enables agents to produce evidence-based resource-allocation recommendations (e.g., personnel assignments, budget allocations), further reinforced by historical analogs and daily change signals for incremental updates. We evaluate the framework in real wildfire scenarios across multiple LLM models, showing that geospatially grounded agents can outperform baselines. The proposed framework can generalize to other hazards such as floods and hurricanes.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.

Builds on

7 of 50 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2023DisasterResponseGPT: Large Language Models for Accelerated Plan of Action Development in Disaster Response Scenarioscited by 34
  3. 2024WildfireGPT: Tailored Large Language Model for Wildfire Analysiscited by 15
  4. 2025From Pixels to Places: A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Image Geolocalization Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 12
  5. 2025RAG for Geoscience: What We Expect, Gaps and Opportunitiescited by 5
  6. 2025Predicting Human Mobility during Extreme Events via LLM-Enhanced Cross-City Learningcited by 1
  7. 2025GeoResponder: Towards Building Geospatial LLMs for Time-Critical Disaster Responsecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A RAG-Based Multi-Agent LLM System for Natural Hazard Resilience and Adaptation
  2. 2026Risk-Aware LLM Agents for Geospatial Data Retrieval: Design and Preliminary Adversarial Evaluation
  3. 2026Can LLM Agents Respond to Disasters? Benchmarking Heterogeneous Geospatial Reasoning in Emergency Operations
  4. 2026WildfireVLM: AI-powered Analysis for Early Wildfire Detection and Risk Assessment Using Satellite Imagery
  5. 2026IC-EO: Interpretable Code-based assistant for Earth Observation
  6. 2025Geo-OLM: Enabling Sustainable Earth Observation Studies with Cost-Efficient Open Language Models & State-Driven Workflows
  7. 2026SIREN: Towards End-to-End Extreme-Weather Early Warning with Experience-Grounded LLM Agents
  8. 2026TerraLogic: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Geospatial Reasoning in Earth Observation