JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely applied to legal tasks. To enhance their understanding of legal texts and improve reasoning accuracy, a promising approach is to incorporate legal theories. One of the most widely adopted theories is the Four-Element Theory (FET), which defines the crime constitution through four elements: Subject, Object, Subjective Aspect, and Objective Aspect. While recent work has explored prompting LLMs to follow FET, our evaluation demonstrates that LLM-generated four-elements are often incomplete and less representative, limiting their effectiveness in legal reasoning. To address these issues, we present JUREX-4E, an expert-annotated four-element knowledge base covering 155 criminal charges. The annotations follow a progressive hierarchical framework grounded in legal source validity and incorporate diverse interpretive methods to ensure precision and authority. We evaluate JUREX-4E on the Similar Charge Disambiguation task and apply it to Legal Case Retrieval. Experimental results validate the high quality of JUREX-4E and its substantial impact on downstream legal tasks, underscoring its potential for advancing legal AI applications. The dataset and code are available at: https://github.com/THUlawtech/JUREX
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.
Builds on
17 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration3 Oct
- 2024Chain of Logic: Rule-Based Reasoning with Large Language Models16 Feb
Other references · 15
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
- 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 168
- 2023Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecturecited by 119
- 2023DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Servicescited by 117
- 2020LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law Schoolcited by 111
- 2023LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Modelscited by 111
- 2023Lawyer LLaMA Technical Reportcited by 54
- 2024LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 36
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2026PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practicecited by 13
- 2025GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 6
- 2025When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governancecited by 3
- 2026OBJECTION! Lawyer Agents Mitigate Guilty Bias in Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 0
- 2026LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning22 Sep 2026
- 2026OBJECTION! Lawyer Agents Mitigate Guilty Bias in Legal Judgment Prediction2 Sep 2026
- 2026PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice23 Jan 2026
- 2025GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction22 Aug 2025
- 2025When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governance10 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Benchmarking Multi-Step Legal Reasoning and Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Effects in Large Language Models
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025LeMAJ (Legal LLM-as-a-Judge): Bridging Legal Reasoning and LLM Evaluation
- 2025Structured Definitions and Segmentations for Legal Reasoning in LLMs: A Study on Indian Legal Data
- 2026BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law
- 2025CLaw: Benchmarking Chinese Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models - A Fine-grained Corpus and Reasoning Analysis
- 2025Towards Trustworthy Legal AI through LLM Agents and Formal Reasoning
- 2025Evaluating Test-Time Scaling LLMs for Legal Reasoning: OpenAI o1, DeepSeek-R1, and Beyond