mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Graph to Word Bag: Introducing Domain Knowledge to Confusing Charge Prediction

arXiv 2403.04369 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2024cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Confusing charge prediction is a challenging task in legal AI, which involves predicting confusing charges based on fact descriptions. While existing charge prediction methods have shown impressive performance, they face significant challenges when dealing with confusing charges, such as Snatch and Robbery. In the legal domain, constituent elements play a pivotal role in distinguishing confusing charges. Constituent elements are fundamental behaviors underlying criminal punishment and have subtle distinctions among charges. In this paper, we introduce a novel From Graph to Word Bag (FWGB) approach, which introduces domain knowledge regarding constituent elements to guide the model in making judgments on confusing charges, much like a judge's reasoning process. Specifically, we first construct a legal knowledge graph containing constituent elements to help select keywords for each charge, forming a word bag. Subsequently, to guide the model's attention towards the differentiating information for each charge within the context, we expand the attention mechanism and introduce a new loss function with attention supervision through words in the word bag. We construct the confusing charges dataset from real-world judicial documents. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, especially in maintaining exceptional performance in imbalanced label distributions.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2024.

Builds on

16 of 40 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 549
  3. 2020Revisiting Pre-Trained Models for Chinese Natural Language Processingcited by 262
  4. 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 168
  5. 2020How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligencecited by 128
  6. 2021Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documentscited by 115
  7. 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81
  8. 2020Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 62
  9. 2017Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basiscited by 61
  10. 2015A C-LSTM Neural Network for Text Classificationcited by 54
  11. 2023Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaborationcited by 52
  12. 2022A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challengescited by 50
4 more
  1. 2018Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptionscited by 36
  2. 2019CAIL2019-SCM: A Dataset of Similar Case Matching in Legal Domaincited by 30
  3. 2019Creating Auxiliary Representations from Charge Definitions for Criminal Charge Predictioncited by 4
  4. 2022Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction
  2. 2024Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration
  3. 2026Charge as a Construct-Validity Factor in Chinese Legal Case Retrieval: A Cross-Benchmark Audit ↗
  4. 2026Multi-Source Retrieval and Reasoning for Legal Sentencing Prediction
  5. 2024Beyond Guilt: Legal Judgment Prediction with Trichotomous Reasoning
  6. 2026JPO: Juris Policy Optimization for Structured Legal Reasoning in Criminal Judgment Prediction
  7. 2026Legal Reasoning Is Not Lawyering: Rethinking Legal Benchmarks for Pro Se Access to Justice
  8. 2026PROSLEX: A Novel Dataset for Expert-Annotated Legal Statute Prediction for Indian Judiciary