Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Model collapse from synthetic data
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly prevalent, their generated outputs are proliferating across the web, risking a future where machine-generated content dilutes human-authored text. Since online data is the primary resource for LLM pre-training, subsequent models could be trained on an unknown portion of synthetic samples. This could lead to model collapse, a degenerative process whereby LLMs reinforce their own errors, reduce output diversity, and ultimately yield declining performance. In this study, we investigate the impact of decoding strategy on model collapse, analysing the text characteristics at each model generation, the similarity to human references, and the resulting model performance. Using the decoding strategies that lead to the most significant degradation, we evaluate model collapse in a more realistic scenario where the origin of the data (human or synthetic) is unknown. We train a machine-generated text detector and propose an importance resampling approach to prevent model collapse by up-sampling likely human content in the training data. Our method is validated on four LLMs from two model families (GPT-2 and SmolLM2), across a range of model sizes 124M to 1.7B). We demonstrate that it not only prevents model collapse but also improves performance compared to training on purely human data, underscoring the benefit of synthetic samples and the importance of data curation.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Model collapse from synthetic data, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 34 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2025.
Builds on
34 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data1 Apr
- 2024A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws10 Feb
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget27 May
Other references · 31
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
- 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 527
19 more
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
- 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 239
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 202
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 157
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
- 2024A Note on Shumailov et al. (2024): `AI Models Collapse When Trained on Recursively Generated Data'cited by 114
- 2023On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Datacited by 98
- 2023The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Textcited by 97
- 2023Large Language Models Suffer From Their Own Output: An Analysis of the Self-Consuming Training Loopcited by 75
- 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
- 2023ConDA: Contrastive Domain Adaptation for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 37
- 2024Self-Improving Diffusion Models with Synthetic Datacited by 34
- 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
- 2024Decoding Decoded: Understanding Hyperparameter Effects in Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 26
- 2024How to Synthesize Text Data without Model Collapse?cited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 10.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025What happens when generative AI models train recursively on each others' outputs?cited by 5
- 2025Stabilizing Self-Consuming Diffusion Models with Latent Space Filteringcited by 3
- 2026'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptionscited by 3
- 2026Pangram 4 Technical Reportcited by 3
- 2025ForTIFAI: Fending Off Recursive Training Induced Failure for AI Model Collapsecited by 1
- 2025First-Extinction Law for Resampling Processescited by 1
- 2026NOTAI.AI: Explainable Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Curvature and Feature Attributioncited by 1
- 2026MELD: Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector for AI-Generated Textcited by 1
- 2026Learning from Synthetic Data without Model Collapse in Iterative Instruction Tuningcited by 1
- 2026On the Salience of Low-Probability Tokens for AI-Generated Text Detection: A Multiscale Uncertainty Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Latent Trajectory Discrimination for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Decoupling Token Roles in Autoregressive Pretrainingcited by 0
2 more
- 2026Synthetic Data Characterization via Training Dynamics30 Sep 2026
- 2026IVT-Guard: All-in-One Reasoning Model for AI-Generated Content Detection27 Sep 2026
- 2026Decoupling Token Roles in Autoregressive Pretraining27 Sep 2026
- 2026Pangram 4 Technical Report29 Jul 2026
- 2026Learning from Synthetic Data without Model Collapse in Iterative Instruction Tuning19 Jul 2026
- 2026Latent Trajectory Discrimination for AI-Generated Text Detection16 Jul 2026
- 2026'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptions3 Jun 2026
- 2026On the Salience of Low-Probability Tokens for AI-Generated Text Detection: A Multiscale Uncertainty Perspective1 Jun 2026
- 2026MELD: Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector for AI-Generated Text7 May 2026
- 2026NOTAI.AI: Explainable Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Curvature and Feature Attribution5 Mar 2026
- 2025Stabilizing Self-Consuming Diffusion Models with Latent Space Filtering16 Nov 2025
- 2025First-Extinction Law for Resampling Processes24 Sep 2025
- 2025What happens when generative AI models train recursively on each others' outputs?cited by 5
- 2026'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptionscited by 3
- 2026Pangram 4 Technical Reportcited by 3
- 2025First-Extinction Law for Resampling Processescited by 1
- 2026NOTAI.AI: Explainable Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Curvature and Feature Attributioncited by 1
- 2026MELD: Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector for AI-Generated Textcited by 1
- 2026On the Salience of Low-Probability Tokens for AI-Generated Text Detection: A Multiscale Uncertainty Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Latent Trajectory Discrimination for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Decoupling Token Roles in Autoregressive Pretrainingcited by 0
- 2026Decoupling Token Roles in Autoregressive Pretraining27 Sep 2026
- 2026Pangram 4 Technical Report29 Jul 2026
- 2026Latent Trajectory Discrimination for AI-Generated Text Detection16 Jul 2026
- 2026'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptions3 Jun 2026
- 2026On the Salience of Low-Probability Tokens for AI-Generated Text Detection: A Multiscale Uncertainty Perspective1 Jun 2026
- 2026MELD: Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector for AI-Generated Text7 May 2026
- 2026NOTAI.AI: Explainable Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Curvature and Feature Attribution5 Mar 2026
- 2025First-Extinction Law for Resampling Processes24 Sep 2025
- 2025What happens when generative AI models train recursively on each others' outputs?27 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verification
- 2026Break Step: Recursive Training Resonates with Replayed Sampling Noise
- 2024How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapse
- 2026Experimental evidence of progressive ChatGPT models self-convergence
- 2024Strong Model Collapse
- 2026SynthSentry: Detecting Synthetic Data Contamination in Language Model Training Data
- 2023Shall We Pretrain Autoregressive Language Models with Retrieval? A Comprehensive Study
- 2026Language Generation with Replay: A Learning-Theoretic View of Model Collapse