mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning from Synthetic Data without Model Collapse in Iterative Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2607.17043 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Model collapse from synthetic data

Abstract (arXiv)

Model collapse is a central challenge in learning from synthetic data: as later-generation large language models (LLMs) are trained on an increasing proportion of model-generated data, performance can degrade due to narrowed coverage and accumulated bias. Existing work mainly studies how to bound this degradation. In iterative model evolution, however, the more meaningful objective is to ensure that each successive model improves over its predecessor, which requires diagnosing collapse at a granularity that is actionable for data curation. We study this problem in synthetic data self-improving for instruction tuning. We show that collapse in this setting is not simply uniform performance degradation, but can appear as a polarization of competence, where synthetic training reinforces already strong skills while further degrading weak ones. Motivated by this observation, we propose KITE (Knowledge-boundary Instruction Tuning via Exploration), a two-stage framework that combines failure-guided data generation with boundary-aware uncertainty curation. Experiments across several datasets and multiple open-source LLMs show that KITE yields more stable improvement than strong synthetic-data baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Model collapse from synthetic data, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 31 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2026.

Builds on

31 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse21 Feb
  2. 2024Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verification11 Jun
  3. 2024Model Collapse Demystified: The Case of Regression12 Feb
  4. 2024A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws10 Feb
  5. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget27 May

Other references · 26

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  6. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  7. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  8. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  9. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  10. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  11. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  12. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
14 more
  1. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
  2. 2021Generating Datasets with Pretrained Language Modelscited by 192
  3. 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 156
  4. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
  5. 2023AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentationcited by 128
  6. 2024Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalizationcited by 84
  7. 2024Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating Worldcited by 49
  8. 2020Synthetic Data Augmentation for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Question Answeringcited by 41
  9. 2025EvalTree: Profiling Language Model Weaknesses via Hierarchical Capability Treescited by 26
  10. 2024How to Synthesize Text Data without Model Collapse?cited by 24
  11. 2024SyntheT2C: Generating Synthetic Data for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models on the Text2Cypher Taskcited by 19
  12. 2025Oasis: One Image is All You Need for Multimodal Instruction Data Synthesiscited by 13
  13. 2025Escaping Collapse: The Strength of Weak Data for Large Language Model Trainingcited by 11
  14. 2026Learning from Synthetic Data: Limitations of ERMcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Knowledge Collapse in LLMs: When Fluency Survives but Facts Fail under Recursive Synthetic Training
  2. 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning
  3. 2025Characterizing Model Behavior Under Synthetic Data Training: An Empirical Study Across Scales and Mixing Ratios
  4. 2025Escaping Model Collapse via Synthetic Data Verification: Near-term Improvements and Long-term Convergence
  5. 2024Synthetic Data (Almost) from Scratch: Generalized Instruction Tuning for Language Models
  6. 2025BARE: Leveraging Base Language Models for Few-Shot Synthetic Data Generation
  7. 2026An Information-Theoretic Criterion for Efficient Data Synthesis
  8. 2026Preventing Model Collapse: A Fisher-Rao Perspective on the Dynamics of Training with Synthetic Data