mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ForTIFAI: Fending Off Recursive Training Induced Failure for AI Model Collapse

arXiv 2509.08972 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Model collapse from synthetic data

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing reliance on generative AI models is rapidly increasing the volume of synthetic data, with some projections suggesting that most available new data for training could be machine-generated by 2030. This shift to a mainly synthetic content presents a critical challenge: repeated training in synthetic data leads to a phenomenon known as model collapse, where model performance degrades over generations of training, eventually rendering the models ineffective. While the causes of model collapse are increasingly understood, effective mitigation strategies remain scarce. We address this challenge by leveraging a key insight: auto-regressive models tend to generate text sequences to which they assign high confidence (i.e., high log-likelihood). Based on this observation, we introduce the Truncated-Cross-Entropy (TCE) loss function. TCE mitigates collapse by selectively ignoring high-confidence tokens during training, effectively filtering out likely machine-generated artifacts from the learning process. Our experiments demonstrate that models trained with TCE not only learn effectively but also exhibit significantly increased resilience, tolerating over 2.3x more synthetic data before the onset of collapse. In addition, we provide an open-source benchmark for collapse dynamics in mixed-data settings. Our results demonstrate that confidence-aware training objectives can substantially delay collapse onset, offering a practical and generalizable tool for model robustness under synthetic-data exposure.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Model collapse from synthetic data, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Position: Model Collapse Does Not Mean What You Think5 Mar
  2. 2025Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse21 Feb
  3. 2024Strong Model Collapse7 Oct
  4. 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data1 Apr
  5. 2024A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws10 Feb
  6. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget27 May

Other references · 15

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
  5. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  6. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  8. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  9. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  10. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  11. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  12. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
3 more
  1. 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 195
  2. 2024Self-Improving Diffusion Models with Synthetic Datacited by 35
  3. 2024Beyond Accuracy Optimization: Computer Vision Losses for Large Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Escaping Model Collapse via Synthetic Data Verification: Near-term Improvements and Long-term Convergence
  2. 2026Reviewing Model Collapse and Countermeasures
  3. 2025A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization Perspective
  4. 2024A Note on Shumailov et al. (2024): `AI Models Collapse When Trained on Recursively Generated Data'
  5. 2024How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapse
  6. 2025A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops
  7. 2024Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World
  8. 2025When Models Don't Collapse: On the Consistency of Iterative MLE