Causal Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scalability remains a challenge in multi-agent reinforcement learning and is currently under active research. A framework named mean-field reinforcement learning (MFRL) could alleviate the scalability problem by employing the Mean Field Theory to turn a many-agent problem into a two-agent problem. However, this framework lacks the ability to identify essential interactions under nonstationary environments. Causality contains relatively invariant mechanisms behind interactions, though environments are nonstationary. Therefore, we propose an algorithm called causal mean-field Q-learning (CMFQ) to address the scalability problem. CMFQ is ever more robust toward the change of the number of agents though inheriting the compressed representation of MFRL's action-state space. Firstly, we model the causality behind the decision-making process of MFRL into a structural causal model (SCM). Then the essential degree of each interaction is quantified via intervening on the SCM. Furthermore, we design the causality-aware compact representation for behavioral information of agents as the weighted sum of all behavioral information according to their causal effects. We test CMFQ in a mixed cooperative-competitive game and a cooperative game. The result shows that our method has excellent scalability performance in both training in environments containing a large number of agents and testing in environments containing much more agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.
Builds on
17 of 33 references.
References · 17
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
- 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 567
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 503
- 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 280
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 261
- 2018Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 207
- 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 184
- 2021The Causal-Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inferencecited by 98
- 2017MAgent: A Many-Agent Reinforcement Learning Platform for Artificial Collective Intelligencecited by 71
- 2020Learning Individually Inferred Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 55
5 more
- 2020Evolutionary Population Curriculum for Scaling Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 48
- 2018Learning to Teach in Cooperative Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
- 2021Relating Graph Neural Networks to Structural Causal Modelscited by 41
- 2021Mean Field Games Flock! The Reinforcement Learning Waycited by 31
- 2018Hierarchical Macro Strategy Model for MOBA Game AIcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Mean-Field Reinforcement Learning without Synchrony
- 2024Analysis of Multiscale Reinforcement Q-Learning Algorithms for Mean Field Control Games
- 2022Individual-Level Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Mean Field Games
- 2026Mean Field Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Mean-Field Sampling for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Bi-level Mean Field: Dynamic Grouping for Large-Scale MARL
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for Finite Space Mean-Field Type Games
- 2024When is Mean-Field Reinforcement Learning Tractable and Relevant?