Learning from End User Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy over Kernel Densities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study a setting of collecting and learning from private data distributed across end users. In the shuffled model of differential privacy, the end users partially protect their data locally before sharing it, and their data is also anonymized during its collection to enhance privacy. This model has recently become a prominent alternative to central DP, which requires full trust in a central data curator, and local DP, where fully local data protection takes a steep toll on downstream accuracy. Our main technical result is a shuffled DP protocol for privately estimating the kernel density function of a distributed dataset, with accuracy essentially matching central DP. We use it to privately learn a classifier from the end user data, by learning a private density function per class. Moreover, we show that the density function itself can recover the semantic content of its class, despite having been learned in the absence of any unprotected data. Our experiments show the favorable downstream performance of our approach, and highlight key downstream considerations and trade-offs in a practical ML deployment of shuffled DP.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.
Builds on
42 of 63 references.
References · 42
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 153
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 128
- 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
- 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
30 more
- 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 74
- 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 59
- 2020Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Inscited by 39
- 2020Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Modelcited by 34
- 2022Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for R'enyi and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 29
- 2020FLAME: Differentially Private Federated Learning in the Shuffle Modelcited by 27
- 2022Shuffle Private Linear Contextual Banditscited by 27
- 2021Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle Modelcited by 24
- 2021Locally Private k-Means in One Roundcited by 19
- 2021Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single Messagecited by 18
- 2021Shuffle Private Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 17
- 2019Separating Local & Shuffled Differential Privacy via Histogramscited by 16
- 2021On the Renyi Differential Privacy of the Shuffle Modelcited by 16
- 2021Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication Overheadcited by 16
- 2020Pure Differentially Private Summation from Anonymous Messagescited by 15
- 2023On Differentially Private Federated Linear Contextual Banditscited by 14
- 2015The Bernstein Mechanism: Function Release under Differential Privacycited by 13
- 2020Connecting Robust Shuffle Privacy and Pan-Privacycited by 12
- 2023Fast Private Kernel Density Estimation via Locality Sensitive Quantizationcited by 9
- 2024Efficiently Computing Similarities to Private Datasetscited by 9
- 2020On Distributed Differential Privacy and Counting Distinct Elementscited by 8
- 2021Renyi Differential Privacy of the Subsampled Shuffle Model in Distributed Learningcited by 6
- 2021Tight Accounting in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2019Improved Summation from Shufflingcited by 4
- 2021Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake Userscited by 4
- 2021Pure Differential Privacy from Secure Intermediariescited by 4
- 2021Applying the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacy to Vector Aggregationcited by 2
- 2023Concurrent Shuffle Differential Privacy Under Continual Observationcited by 2
- 2019On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messagescited by 1
- 2023Pure-DP Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Error-Optimal and Communication-Efficientcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.