mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pure Differential Privacy from Secure Intermediaries

arXiv 2112.10032 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2021cs.CR cs.DScited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work in differential privacy has explored the prospect of combining local randomization with a secure intermediary. Specifically, there are a variety of protocols in the secure shuffle model (where an intermediary randomly permutes messages) as well as the secure aggregation model (where an intermediary adds messages). Most of these protocols are limited to approximate differential privacy. An exception is the shuffle protocol by Ghazi, Golowich, Kumar, Manurangsi, Pagh, and Velingker (arXiv:2002.01919): it computes bounded sums under pure differential privacy. Its additive error is tildeO(1/varepsilon3/2), where varepsilon is the privacy parameter. In this work, we give a new protocol that ensures O(1/varepsilon) error under pure differential privacy. We also show how to use it to test uniformity of distributions over [d]. The tester's sample complexity has an optimal dependence on d. Our work relies on a novel class of secure intermediaries which are of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.