Pure Differential Privacy from Secure Intermediaries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work in differential privacy has explored the prospect of combining local randomization with a secure intermediary. Specifically, there are a variety of protocols in the secure shuffle model (where an intermediary randomly permutes messages) as well as the secure aggregation model (where an intermediary adds messages). Most of these protocols are limited to approximate differential privacy. An exception is the shuffle protocol by Ghazi, Golowich, Kumar, Manurangsi, Pagh, and Velingker (arXiv:2002.01919): it computes bounded sums under pure differential privacy. Its additive error is tildeO(1/varepsilon3/2), where varepsilon is the privacy parameter. In this work, we give a new protocol that ensures O(1/varepsilon) error under pure differential privacy. We also show how to use it to test uniformity of distributions over [d]. The tester's sample complexity has an optimal dependence on d. Our work relies on a novel class of secure intermediaries which are of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Shuffle Private Linear Contextual Banditscited by 27
- 2022Distributed Differential Privacy in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 14
- 2025Learning from End User Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy over Kernel Densitiescited by 3
- 2022Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy Modelscited by 0
- 2025Learning from End User Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy over Kernel Densities19 Feb 2025
- 2022Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy Models27 Oct 2022
- 2022Distributed Differential Privacy in Multi-Armed Bandits12 Jun 2022
- 2022Shuffle Private Linear Contextual Bandits11 Feb 2022