mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tight Accounting in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacy

arXiv 2106.00477 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2021cs.CR cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Shuffle model of differential privacy is a novel distributed privacy model based on a combination of local privacy mechanisms and a secure shuffler. It has been shown that the additional randomisation provided by the shuffler improves privacy bounds compared to the purely local mechanisms. Accounting tight bounds, however, is complicated by the complexity brought by the shuffler. The recently proposed numerical techniques for evaluating (varepsilon,δ)-differential privacy guarantees have been shown to give tighter bounds than commonly used methods for compositions of various complex mechanisms. In this paper, we show how to obtain accurate bounds for adaptive compositions of general varepsilon-LDP shufflers using the analysis by Feldman et al. (2021) and tight bounds for adaptive compositions of shufflers of k-randomised response mechanisms, using the analysis by Balle et al. (2019). We show how to speed up the evaluation of the resulting privacy loss distribution from O(n2) to O(n), where n is the number of users, without noticeable change in the resulting δ(varepsilon)-upper bounds. We also demonstrate looseness of the existing bounds and methods found in the literature, improving previous composition results significantly.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2021.

Builds on

8 of 20 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  2. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
  3. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  4. 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
  5. 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 73
  6. 2020Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTcited by 43
  7. 2020Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Modelcited by 34
  8. 2021Computing Differential Privacy Guarantees for Heterogeneous Compositions Using FFTcited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

5 papers.