Connecting Robust Shuffle Privacy and Pan-Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the shuffle model of differential privacy, data-holding users send randomized messages to a secure shuffler, the shuffler permutes the messages, and the resulting collection of messages must be differentially private with regard to user data. In the pan-private model, an algorithm processes a stream of data while maintaining an internal state that is differentially private with regard to the stream data. We give evidence connecting these two apparently different models. Our results focus on robustly shuffle private protocols, whose privacy guarantees are not greatly affected by malicious users. First, we give robustly shuffle private protocols and upper bounds for counting distinct elements and uniformity testing. Second, we use pan-private lower bounds to prove robustly shuffle private lower bounds for both problems. Focusing on the dependence on the domain size k, we find that robust approximate shuffle privacy and approximate pan-privacy have additive error Theta(√k) for counting distinct elements. For uniformity testing, we give a robust approximate shuffle private protocol with sample complexity tilde O(k2/3) and show that an Omega(k2/3) dependence is necessary for any robust pure shuffle private tester. Finally, we show that this connection is useful in both directions: we give a pan-private adaptation of recent work on shuffle private histograms and use it to recover further separations between pan-privacy and interactive local privacy.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 127
- 2022The Fundamental Price of Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2021Locally Private k-Means in One Roundcited by 19
- 2021Shuffle Private Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 17
- 2021Towards Sparse Federated Analytics: Location Heatmaps under Distributed Differential Privacy with Secure Aggregationcited by 10
- 2022Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guaranteescited by 4
- 2021The Sample Complexity of Distribution-Free Parity Learning in the Robust Shuffle Modelcited by 1
- 2024Making Old Things New: A Unified Algorithm for Differentially Private Clusteringcited by 1
- 2025Learning from End User Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy over Kernel Densitiescited by 1
- 2025How to Securely Shuffle? A survey about Secure Shufflers for privacy-preserving computationscited by 1
- 2021Uniformity Testing in the Shuffle Model: Simpler, Better, Fastercited by 0
- 2022Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy Modelscited by 0
- 2025How to Securely Shuffle? A survey about Secure Shufflers for privacy-preserving computations2 Jul 2025
- 2025Learning from End User Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy over Kernel Densities19 Feb 2025
- 2024Making Old Things New: A Unified Algorithm for Differentially Private Clustering17 Jun 2024
- 2022Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy Models27 Oct 2022
- 2022Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guarantees8 Sep 2022
- 2022The Fundamental Price of Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learning7 Mar 2022
- 2021Towards Sparse Federated Analytics: Location Heatmaps under Distributed Differential Privacy with Secure Aggregation3 Nov 2021
- 2021Uniformity Testing in the Shuffle Model: Simpler, Better, Faster20 Aug 2021
- 2021Shuffle Private Stochastic Convex Optimization17 Jun 2021
- 2021Locally Private k-Means in One Round20 Apr 2021
- 2021The Sample Complexity of Distribution-Free Parity Learning in the Robust Shuffle Model29 Mar 2021
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregation12 Feb 2021