mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages

arXiv 1908.11358 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2019cs.CR cs.DS cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An exciting new development in differential privacy is the shuffled model, in which an anonymous channel enables non-interactive, differentially private protocols with error much smaller than what is possible in the local model, while relying on weaker trust assumptions than in the central model. In this paper, we study basic counting problems in the shuffled model and establish separations between the error that can be achieved in the single-message shuffled model and in the shuffled model with multiple messages per user. For the problem of frequency estimation for n users and a domain of size B, we obtain: - A nearly tight lower bound of tildeOmega( min(√[4]n, √B)) on the error in the single-message shuffled model. This implies that the protocols obtained from the amplification via shuffling work of Erlingsson et al. (SODA 2019) and Balle et al. (Crypto 2019) are essentially optimal for single-message protocols. A key ingredient in the proof is a lower bound on the error of locally-private frequency estimation in the low-privacy (aka high ε) regime. - Protocols in the multi-message shuffled model with poly(logB, logn) bits of communication per user and polylogB error, which provide an exponential improvement on the error compared to what is possible with single-message algorithms. For the related selection problem on a domain of size B, we prove: - A nearly tight lower bound of Omega(B) on the number of users in the single-message shuffled model. This significantly improves on the Omega(B1/17) lower bound obtained by Cheu et al. (Eurocrypt 2019), and when combined with their tildeO(√B)-error multi-message protocol, implies the first separation between single-message and multi-message protocols for this problem.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.