Measuring the Effect of Transcription Noise on Downstream Language Understanding Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the increasing prevalence of recorded human speech, spoken language understanding (SLU) is essential for its efficient processing. In order to process the speech, it is commonly transcribed using automatic speech recognition technology. This speech-to-text transition introduces errors into the transcripts, which subsequently propagate to downstream NLP tasks, such as dialogue summarization. While it is known that transcript noise affects downstream tasks, a systematic approach to analyzing its effects across different noise severities and types has not been addressed. We propose a configurable framework for assessing task models in diverse noisy settings, and for examining the impact of transcript-cleaning techniques. The framework facilitates the investigation of task model behavior, which can in turn support the development of effective SLU solutions. We exemplify the utility of our framework on three SLU tasks and four task models, offering insights regarding the effect of transcript noise on tasks in general and models in particular. For instance, we find that task models can tolerate a certain level of noise, and are affected differently by the types of errors in the transcript.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.
Builds on
25 of 68 references.
References · 25
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2021QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarizationcited by 363
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
- 2017Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overviewcited by 213
- 2023End-to-End Speech Recognition: A Surveycited by 127
- 2018The fifth 'CHiME' Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge: Dataset, task and baselinescited by 90
- 2018Spoken SQuAD: A Study of Mitigating the Impact of Speech Recognition Errors on Listening Comprehensioncited by 74
- 2021SLUE: New Benchmark Tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation on Natural Speechcited by 70
- 2019A spelling correction model for end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 63
- 2022SLUE Phase-2: A Benchmark Suite of Diverse Spoken Language Understanding Taskscited by 34
- 2020Robustness Testing of Language Understanding in Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 32
- 2020Knowledge Distillation for Improved Accuracy in Spoken Question Answeringcited by 31
13 more
- 2021"How Robust r u?": Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems on Spoken Conversationscited by 30
- 2021FastCorrect 2: Fast Error Correction on Multiple Candidates for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 27
- 2022How Bad Are Artifacts?: Analyzing the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on ASRcited by 27
- 2020Are Neural Open-Domain Dialog Systems Robust to Speech Recognition Errors in the Dialog History? An Empirical Studycited by 19
- 2022Error Correction in ASR using Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 19
- 2021QAConv: Question Answering on Informative Conversationscited by 17
- 2019Robust Neural Machine Translation for Clean and Noisy Speech Transcriptscited by 13
- 2024Useful Blunders: Can Automated Speech Recognition Errors Improve Downstream Dementia Classification?cited by 9
- 2019Impact of ASR on Alzheimer's Disease Detection: All Errors are Equal, but Deletions are More Equal than Otherscited by 8
- 2021An Approach to Improve Robustness of NLP Systems against ASR Errorscited by 8
- 2023Back Transcription as a Method for Evaluating Robustness of Natural Language Understanding Models to Speech Recognition Errorscited by 6
- 2024UCorrect: An Unsupervised Framework for Automatic Speech Recognition Error Correctioncited by 2
- 2024Interventional Speech Noise Injection for ASR Generalizable Spoken Language Understandingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026LoASR-Bench: Evaluating Large Speech Language Models on Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Across Language Familiescited by 1
- 2026When Misinformation Speaks and Converses: Rethinking Fact-Checking in Audio Platformscited by 1
- 2026CORTIS: Text-Only Adaptation of Spoken Language Models for Task-Oriented Voice Agentscited by 0
- 2026When Simpler Is Better: Evaluating Translation Pipelines for Medieval Latin Manuscriptscited by 0
- 2026Whisper-Based Speech Transcription from Videos Across Multiple Languages for Cross-Cultural Understandingcited by 0
- 2026CoSE-E: A Benchmark for Code-switched Speech Evaluation in Enterprise Settingscited by 0
- 2026CoSE-E: A Benchmark for Code-switched Speech Evaluation in Enterprise Settings28 Sep 2026
- 2026Whisper-Based Speech Transcription from Videos Across Multiple Languages for Cross-Cultural Understanding10 Sep 2026
- 2026When Simpler Is Better: Evaluating Translation Pipelines for Medieval Latin Manuscripts4 Jul 2026
- 2026CORTIS: Text-Only Adaptation of Spoken Language Models for Task-Oriented Voice Agents19 Jun 2026
- 2026When Misinformation Speaks and Converses: Rethinking Fact-Checking in Audio Platforms18 Apr 2026
- 2026LoASR-Bench: Evaluating Large Speech Language Models on Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Across Language Families20 Mar 2026