KL Penalty Control via Perturbation for Direct Preference Optimization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) demonstrates the advantage of aligning a large language model with human preference using only an offline dataset. However, DPO has the limitation that the KL penalty, which prevents excessive deviation from the reference model, is static throughout the training process. Several methods claim to change this static KL penalty of DPO into a dynamic one, but no approach can adaptively assign different KL penalties for each preference pair. In this paper, we propose varepsilon-Direct Preference Optimization (varepsilon-DPO), which allows adaptive control of the KL penalty strength β for each preference pair. Specifically, varepsilon-DPO adaptively controls β for each preference pair based on the monotonicity of logits as a preference model under the perturbation of β during training. This is equivalent to adjusting the KL penalty by checking whether the change in training-time temperature can lead to better preference confidence as preference models by simply reusing the logit of the current policy and the reference policy. Experimental results show that the simple criterion of varepsilon-DPO for KL penalty relaxation significantly improves DPO compared to most existing direct alignment algorithms on general chatbot benchmarks and reveal that this KL penalty control criterion can reflect confusion as a preference model and provide an efficient KL trade-off, highlighting the significance of instance-level adaptive KL penalty control in DPO.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 40 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.
Builds on
40 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 10
Same direction, newest first
- 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic β11 Jul
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment15 Apr
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Aligning Large Language Models by On-Policy Self-Judgment17 Feb
- 2024Decoding-time Realignment of Language Models5 Feb
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment1 Dec
Other references · 30
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,278
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,486
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,916
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,986
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,876
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,494
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,785
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,902
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,798
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,053
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,691
18 more
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,123
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,949
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,513
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,139
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,102
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,968
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,077
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 877
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 600
- 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 553
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 491
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 459
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 400
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 398
- 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 185
- 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 142
- 2023Stay on topic with Classifier-Free Guidancecited by 90
- 2023An Emulator for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models using Small Language Modelscited by 61
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025TB or Not TB: Coverage-Driven Direct Preference Optimization for Verilog Stimulus Generationcited by 4
- 2026Displacement-Resistant Extensions of DPO with Nonconvex f-Divergencescited by 0
- 2026Intrinsic Mutual Information as a Modulator for Preference Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026REVA-PO: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for Chest X-ray Report Generationcited by 0
- 2026Se-DPO: Self-Evolving Token Credit for Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Se-DPO: Self-Evolving Token Credit for Direct Preference Optimization10 Aug 2026
- 2026REVA-PO: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for Chest X-ray Report Generation11 Jul 2026
- 2026Intrinsic Mutual Information as a Modulator for Preference Optimization27 Apr 2026
- 2026Displacement-Resistant Extensions of DPO with Nonconvex f-Divergences6 Feb 2026
- 2025TB or Not TB: Coverage-Driven Direct Preference Optimization for Verilog Stimulus Generation19 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization
- 2024Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization
- 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
- 2025Margin Adaptive DPO: Leveraging Reward Model for Granular Control in Preference Optimization
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
- 2024Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness
- 2024New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization