mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SEFL: A Framework for Generating Synthetic Educational Assignment Feedback with LLM Agents

arXiv 2502.12927 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving

Abstract (arXiv)

Providing high-quality feedback on student assignments is crucial for student success, but it is heavily limited by time and budgetary constraints. In this work, we introduce Synthetic Educational Feedback Loops (SEFL), a synthetic data framework designed to generate data that resembles immediate, on-demand feedback at scale without relying on extensive, real-world student assignments and teacher feedback. To obtain this type of data, two large language models (LLMs) operate in a teacher-student role to simulate assignment completion and formative feedback, generating 19.8K synthetic pairs of student work and corresponding critiques and actionable improvements from a teacher. With this data, we fine-tune smaller, more computationally efficient LLMs on these synthetic pairs, enabling them to replicate key features of high-quality, goal-oriented feedback. Through comprehensive evaluations with three LLM judges and three human experts, across a subset of 900 outputs, we demonstrate that SEFL-tuned models outperform both their untuned counterparts and an existing baseline in terms of feedback quality. The potential for societal impact is reinforced by extensive qualitative comments and ratings from human stakeholders -- both students and higher education instructors. SEFL has the potential to transform feedback processes for higher education and beyond.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 24 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

Builds on

24 of 70 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  4. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  5. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  6. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  7. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 431
  8. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  9. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 301
  10. 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 294
  11. 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 195
  12. 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 185
12 more
  1. 2023Exploring the Use of Large Language Models for Reference-Free Text Quality Evaluation: An Empirical Studycited by 85
  2. 2024Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generationcited by 63
  3. 2024Tutor CoPilot: A Human-AI Approach for Scaling Real-Time Expertisecited by 46
  4. 2022The NCTE Transcripts: A Dataset of Elementary Math Classroom Transcriptscited by 43
  5. 2022The TalkMoves Dataset: K-12 Mathematics Lesson Transcripts Annotated for Teacher and Student Discursive Movescited by 38
  6. 2024Book2Dial: Generating Teacher-Student Interactions from Textbooks for Cost-Effective Development of Educational Chatbotscited by 25
  7. 2022Generating Information-Seeking Conversations from Unlabeled Documentscited by 17
  8. 2024ChatGPT Rates Natural Language Explanation Quality Like Humans: But on Which Scales?cited by 17
  9. 2024Toward In-Context Teaching: Adapting Examples to Students' Misconceptionscited by 12
  10. 2024Edu-ConvoKit: An Open-Source Library for Education Conversation Datacited by 11
  11. 2024BIPED: Pedagogically Informed Tutoring System for ESL Educationcited by 7
  12. 2023The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AIcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026REFINE: Real-world Exploration of Interactive Feedback and Student Behaviour
  2. 2025Dean of LLM Tutors: A Framework for Automated Quality Review of AI-generated Feedback
  3. 2025Towards Adaptive Feedback with AI: Comparing the Feedback Quality of LLMs and Teachers on Experimentation Protocols
  4. 2024Improving the Validity of Automatically Generated Feedback via Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026A Classroom Study of LLM-Generated Feedback Intervention in Introductory Programming
  6. 2025LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applications
  7. 2024Closing the Loop: Learning to Generate Writing Feedback via Language Model Simulated Student Revisions
  8. 2024AgentInstruct: Toward Generative Teaching with Agentic Flows