mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Rank for Blind Image Quality Assessment

arXiv 1309.0213 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2013cs.CVcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) aims to predict perceptual image quality scores without access to reference images. State-of-the-art BIQA methods typically require subjects to score a large number of images to train a robust model. However, subjective quality scores are imprecise, biased, and inconsistent, and it is challenging to obtain a large scale database, or to extend existing databases, because of the inconvenience of collecting images, training the subjects, conducting subjective experiments, and realigning human quality evaluations. To combat these limitations, this paper explores and exploits preference image pairs (PIPs) such as "the quality of image Ia is better than that of image Ib" for training a robust BIQA model. The preference label, representing the relative quality of two images, is generally precise and consistent, and is not sensitive to image content, distortion type, or subject identity; such PIPs can be generated at very low cost. The proposed BIQA method is one of learning to rank. We first formulate the problem of learning the mapping from the image features to the preference label as one of classification. In particular, we investigate the utilization of a multiple kernel learning algorithm based on group lasso (MKLGL) to provide a solution. A simple but effective strategy to estimate perceptual image quality scores is then presented. Experiments show that the proposed BIQA method is highly effective and achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art BIQA algorithms. Moreover, the proposed method can be easily extended to new distortion categories.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 9; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
  2. 2025VisualQuality-R1: Reasoning-Induced Image Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning to Rankcited by 77
  3. 2024Adaptive Image Quality Assessment via Teaching Large Multimodal Model to Comparecited by 66
  4. 2021Quantifying Visual Image Quality: A Bayesian Viewcited by 20
  5. 2024Exploring AIGC Video Quality: A Focus on Visual Harmony, Video-Text Consistency and Domain Distribution Gapcited by 13
  6. 2024SEAGULL: No-reference Image Quality Assessment for Regions of Interest via Vision-Language Instruction Tuningcited by 13
  7. 2024VE-Bench: Subjective-Aligned Benchmark Suite for Text-Driven Video Editing Quality Assessmentcited by 10
  8. 2023On the Effectiveness of Spectral Discriminators for Perceptual Quality Improvementcited by 8
  9. 2022Quality Evaluation of Arbitrary Style Transfer: Subjective Study and Objective Metriccited by 6
  10. 2025MR-UIE: Multi-Perspective Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning for Universal Information Extractioncited by 6
  11. 2022Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approachescited by 5
  12. 2024GMC-IQA: Exploiting Global-correlation and Mean-opinion Consistency for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
13 more
  1. 2024Learning semantic image quality for fetal ultrasound from noisy ranking annotationcited by 4
  2. 2021Residual Networks based Distortion Classification and Ranking for Laparoscopic Image Quality Assessmentcited by 3
  3. 2025TableZoomer: A Collaborative Agent Framework for Large-scale Table Question Answeringcited by 3
  4. 2021Learning Transformer Features for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  5. 2024Pairwise Comparisons Are All You Needcited by 1
  6. 2024MobileIQA: Exploiting Mobile-level Diverse Opinion Network For No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Knowledge Distillationcited by 1
  7. 2024Attention Down-Sampling Transformer, Relative Ranking and Self-Consistency for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  8. 2025No-reference geometry quality assessment for colorless point clouds via list-wise rank learningcited by 1
  9. 2022Image Quality Assessment: Learning to Rank Image Distortion Levelcited by 0
  10. 2025Annotation-Free Human Sketch Quality Assessmentcited by 0
  11. 2026ME-IQA: Memory-Enhanced Image Quality Assessment via Re-Rankingcited by 0
  12. 2026MR-IQA: A Unified Margin View of Regression and Ranking for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
  13. 2026Di2CycleSB: Towards High-Quality Unsupervised Nighttime Visibility Enhancement via Schr"odinger Bridge Transformercited by 0