mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When do they StOP?: A First Step Towards Automatically Identifying Team Communication in the Operating Room

arXiv 2502.08299 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: Surgical performance depends not only on surgeons' technical skills but also on team communication within and across the different professional groups present during the operation. Therefore, automatically identifying team communication in the OR is crucial for patient safety and advances in the development of computer-assisted surgical workflow analysis and intra-operative support systems. To take the first step, we propose a new task of detecting communication briefings involving all OR team members, i.e. the team Time-out and the StOP?-protocol, by localizing their start and end times in video recordings of surgical operations. Methods: We generate an OR dataset of real surgeries, called Team-OR, with more than one hundred hours of surgical videos captured by the multi-view camera system in the OR. The dataset contains temporal annotations of 33 Time-out and 22 StOP?-protocol activities in total. We then propose a novel group activity detection approach, where we encode both scene context and action features, and use an efficient neural network model to output the results. Results: The experimental results on the Team-OR dataset show that our approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art temporal action detection approaches. It also demonstrates the lack of research on group activities in the OR, proving the significance of our dataset. Conclusion: We investigate the Team Time-Out and the StOP?-protocol in the OR, by presenting the first OR dataset with temporal annotations of group activities protocols, and introducing a novel group activity detection approach that outperforms existing approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/CAMMA-public/Team-OR.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
  2. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  3. 2021ByteTrack: Multi-Object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Boxcited by 812
  4. 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 516
  5. 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 454
  6. 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
  7. 2022ActionFormer: Localizing Moments of Actions with Transformerscited by 308
  8. 2019G-TAD: Sub-Graph Localization for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 248
  9. 2021Learning Salient Boundary Feature for Anchor-free Temporal Action Localizationcited by 156
  10. 2023TriDet: Temporal Action Detection with Relative Boundary Modelingcited by 141
  11. 2022PYSKL: Towards Good Practices for Skeleton Action Recognitioncited by 83
  12. 2018MVOR: A Multi-view RGB-D Operating Room Dataset for 2D and 3D Human Pose Estimationcited by 49
5 more
  1. 20224D-OR: Semantic Scene Graphs for OR Domain Modelingcited by 49
  2. 2023MOSaiC: a Web-based Platform for Collaborative Medical Video Assessment and Annotationcited by 11
  3. 2021Unsupervised domain adaptation for clinician pose estimation and instance segmentation in the operating roomcited by 7
  4. 2023ACT-Net: Anchor-context Action Detection in Surgery Videoscited by 4
  5. 2024ViTALS: Vision Transformer for Action Localization in Surgical Nephrectomycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.