mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing Hierarchical Structure in Vision Models with Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2505.15970 ↗First posted 21 May 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting vision and multimodal models

Abstract (arXiv)

The ImageNet hierarchy provides a structured taxonomy of object categories, offering a valuable lens through which to analyze the representations learned by deep vision models. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of how vision models encode the ImageNet hierarchy, leveraging Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to probe their internal representations. SAEs have been widely used as an explanation tool for large language models (LLMs), where they enable the discovery of semantically meaningful features. Here, we extend their use to vision models to investigate whether learned representations align with the ontological structure defined by the ImageNet taxonomy. Our results show that SAEs uncover hierarchical relationships in model activations, revealing an implicit encoding of taxonomic structure. We analyze the consistency of these representations across different layers of the popular vision foundation model DINOv2 and provide insights into how deep vision models internalize hierarchical category information by increasing information in the class token through each layer. Our study establishes a framework for systematic hierarchical analysis of vision model representations and highlights the potential of SAEs as a tool for probing semantic structure in deep networks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting vision and multimodal models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2025.

Builds on

11 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoders10 Feb

Other references · 10

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  5. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  6. 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 320
  7. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
  8. 2017Do Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Class Hierarchy?cited by 61
  9. 2024The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structurecited by 52
  10. 2023HGCLIP: Exploring Vision-Language Models with Graph Representations for Hierarchical Understandingcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
  2. 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Learn Meaningful Concept Hierarchies?
  3. 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spaces
  4. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment
  5. 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languages
  6. 2025Uncovering Conceptual Blindspots in Generative Image Models Using Sparse Autoencoders
  7. 2026When Structured Sparse Autoencoders Learn Consistent Concepts Across Modalities
  8. 2026Explaining, Verifying, and Aligning Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Model Embeddings