mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining How Visual, Textual and Multimodal Encoders Share Concepts

arXiv 2507.18512 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful technique for extracting human-interpretable features from neural networks activations. Previous works compared different models based on SAE-derived features but those comparisons have been restricted to models within the same modality. We propose a novel indicator allowing quantitative comparison of models across SAE features, and use it to conduct a comparative study of visual, textual and multimodal encoders. We also propose to quantify the Comparative Sharedness of individual features between different classes of models. With these two new tools, we conduct several studies on 21 encoders of the three types, with two significantly different sizes, and considering generalist and domain specific datasets. The results allow to revisit previous studies at the light of encoders trained in a multimodal context and to quantify to which extent all these models share some representations or features. They also suggest that visual features that are specific to VLMs among vision encoders are shared with text encoders, highlighting the impact of text pretraining. The code is available at https://github.com/CEA-LIST/SAEshareConcepts

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2025.

Builds on

36 of 47 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  8. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  9. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  10. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  11. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  12. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
24 more
  1. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  2. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  4. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
  5. 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 526
  6. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
  7. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 362
  8. 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 254
  9. 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 247
  10. 2024MambaVision: A Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Vision Backbonecited by 222
  11. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
  12. 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 128
  13. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 108
  14. 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Modelscited by 100
  15. 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
  16. 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 66
  17. 2022Finding Skill Neurons in Pre-trained Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 65
  18. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
  19. 2023Rosetta Neurons: Mining the Common Units in a Model Zoocited by 46
  20. 2024The Missing Curve Detectors of InceptionV1: Applying Sparse Autoencoders to InceptionV1 Early Visioncited by 37
  21. 2024Towards Universality: Studying Mechanistic Similarity Across Language Model Architecturescited by 31
  22. 2023Do Vision and Language Models Share Concepts? A Vector Space Alignment Studycited by 27
  23. 2025Interpretable and Testable Vision Features via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 24
  24. 2022GULP: a prediction-based metric between representationscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Extraction and Analysis of Multimodal Concepts in Vision Language Models through Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
  4. 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spaces
  5. 2026Evaluating the Interpretability of Sparse Autoencoders with Concept Annotations
  6. 2026Same Concept, Different Directions: Cross-Modal Feature Heterogeneity in Sparse Autoencoders
  7. 2026When Structured Sparse Autoencoders Learn Consistent Concepts Across Modalities
  8. 2025SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignment