From Logistic Regression to the Perceptron Algorithm: Exploring Gradient Descent with Large Step Sizes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We focus on the classification problem with a separable dataset, one of the most important and classical problems from machine learning. The standard approach to this task is logistic regression with gradient descent (LR+GD). Recent studies have observed that LR+GD can find a solution with arbitrarily large step sizes, defying conventional optimization theory. Our work investigates this phenomenon and makes three interconnected key observations about LR+GD with large step sizes. First, we find a remarkably simple explanation of why LR+GD with large step sizes solves the classification problem: LR+GD reduces to a batch version of the celebrated perceptron algorithm when the step size γ → ∞. Second, we observe that larger step sizes lead LR+GD to higher logistic losses when it tends to the perceptron algorithm, but larger step sizes also lead to faster convergence to a solution for the classification problem, meaning that logistic loss is an unreliable metric of the proximity to a solution. Surprisingly, high loss values can actually indicate faster convergence. Third, since the convergence rate in terms of loss function values of LR+GD is unreliable, we examine the iteration complexity required by LR+GD with large step sizes to solve the classification problem and prove that this complexity is suboptimal. To address this, we propose a new method, Normalized LR+GD - based on the connection between LR+GD and the perceptron algorithm - with much better theoretical guarantees.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.
Builds on
9 of 36 references.
References · 9
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2020The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanismcited by 206
- 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 81
- 2022Understanding Edge-of-Stability Training Dynamics with a Minimalist Examplecited by 54
- 2022Beyond the Quadratic Approximation: the Multiscale Structure of Neural Network Loss Landscapescited by 42
- 2022Beyond the Edge of Stability via Two-step Gradient Updatescited by 38
- 2023Trajectory Alignment: Understanding the Edge of Stability Phenomenon via Bifurcation Theorycited by 24
- 2024Gradient Descent on Logistic Regression with Non-Separable Data and Large Step Sizescited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Minimax Optimal Convergence of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression via Large and Adaptive Stepsizescited by 5
- 2025Any-stepsize Gradient Descent for Separable Data under Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 1
- 2026Finite-Sample Performance of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression with Gaussian Designcited by 1
- 2026Tight Bounds for Logistic Regression with Large Stepsize Gradient Descent in Low Dimensioncited by 0
- 2026Non-asymptotic implicit bias of logistic regression at early-stage gradient descent dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Non-asymptotic implicit bias of logistic regression at early-stage gradient descent dynamics5 Aug 2026
- 2026Finite-Sample Performance of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression with Gaussian Design19 Jun 2026
- 2026Tight Bounds for Logistic Regression with Large Stepsize Gradient Descent in Low Dimension12 Feb 2026
- 2025Minimax Optimal Convergence of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression via Large and Adaptive Stepsizes5 Apr 2025
- 2025Any-stepsize Gradient Descent for Separable Data under Fenchel-Young Losses7 Feb 2025