mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Free Energy Risk Metrics for Systemically Safe AI: Gatekeeping Multi-Agent Study

arXiv 2502.04249 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2025cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 2

On the map: World models → Latent dynamics models and model-based RL

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the Free Energy Principle as a foundation for measuring risk in agentic and multi-agent systems. From these principles we introduce a Cumulative Risk Exposure metric that is flexible to differing contexts and needs. We contrast this to other popular theories for safe AI that hinge on massive amounts of data or describing arbitrarily complex world models. In our framework, stakeholders need only specify their preferences over system outcomes, providing straightforward and transparent decision rules for risk governance and mitigation. This framework naturally accounts for uncertainty in both world model and preference model, allowing for decision-making that is epistemically and axiologically humble, parsimonious, and future-proof. We demonstrate this novel approach in a simplified autonomous vehicle environment with multi-agent vehicles whose driving policies are mediated by gatekeepers that evaluate, in an online fashion, the risk to the collective safety in their neighborhood, and intervene through each vehicle's policy when appropriate. We show that the introduction of gatekeepers in an AV fleet, even at low penetration, can generate significant positive externalities in terms of increased system safety.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent dynamics models and model-based RL, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

Builds on

8 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems10 May

Other references · 7

  1. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
  2. 2021Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challengescited by 52
  3. 2024Gymnasium: A Standard Interface for Reinforcement Learning Environmentscited by 35
  4. 2023Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGIcited by 29
  5. 2024Can a Bayesian Oracle Prevent Harm from an Agent?cited by 12
  6. 2022Loss as the Inconsistency of a Probabilistic Dependency Graph: Choose Your Model, Not Your Loss Functioncited by 6
  7. 2022Variational Inference for Model-Free and Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents
  2. 2024From homeostasis to resource sharing: Biologically and economically aligned multi-objective multi-agent gridworld-based AI safety benchmarks
  3. 2026Beyond single-channel agentic benchmarking
  4. 2024The AI risk repository: A meta-review, database, and taxonomy of risks from artificial intelligence
  5. 2025A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems
  6. 2025From Refusal to Recovery: A Control-Theoretic Approach to Generative AI Guardrails
  7. 2026Soft-Label Governance for Distributional Safety in Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2025Security Risks of Agentic Vehicles: A Systematic Analysis of Cognitive and Cross-Layer Threats