mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving the Perturbation-Based Explanation of Deepfake Detectors Through the Use of Adversarially-Generated Samples

arXiv 2502.03957 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we introduce the idea of using adversarially-generated samples of the input images that were classified as deepfakes by a detector, to form perturbation masks for inferring the importance of different input features and produce visual explanations. We generate these samples based on Natural Evolution Strategies, aiming to flip the original deepfake detector's decision and classify these samples as real. We apply this idea to four perturbation-based explanation methods (LIME, SHAP, SOBOL and RISE) and evaluate the performance of the resulting modified methods using a SOTA deepfake detection model, a benchmarking dataset (FaceForensics++) and a corresponding explanation evaluation framework. Our quantitative assessments document the mostly positive contribution of the proposed perturbation approach in the performance of explanation methods. Our qualitative analysis shows the capacity of the modified explanation methods to demarcate the manipulated image regions more accurately, and thus to provide more useful explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  6. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
  7. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  8. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  9. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  10. 2020The DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Datasetcited by 132
  11. 2021A Review of Speaker Diarization: Recent Advances with Deep Learningcited by 124
  12. 2022A Consistent and Efficient Evaluation Strategy for Attribution Methodscited by 102
13 more
  1. 2021Video Summarization Using Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 85
  2. 2020A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learningcited by 80
  3. 2024Can ChatGPT Detect DeepFakes? A Study of Using Multimodal Large Language Models for Media Forensicscited by 69
  4. 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
  5. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
  6. 2019Towards Explainable Deep Neural Networks (xDNN)cited by 61
  7. 2024Foundation Models for Video Understanding: A Surveycited by 46
  8. 2024Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Directioncited by 46
  9. 2022Metrics for saliency map evaluation of deep learning explanation methodscited by 40
  10. 2023An adversarial attack approach for eXplainable AI evaluation on deepfake detection modelscited by 7
  11. 2024Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detectioncited by 6
  12. 2024T-TAME: Trainable Attention Mechanism for Explaining Convolutional Networks and Vision Transformerscited by 4
  13. 2021What's wrong with this video? Comparing Explainers for Deepfake Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.