mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What's wrong with this video? Comparing Explainers for Deepfake Detection

arXiv 2105.05902 ↗First posted 12 May 2021cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deepfakes are computer manipulated videos where the face of an individual has been replaced with that of another. Software for creating such forgeries is easy to use and ever more popular, causing serious threats to personal reputation and public security. The quality of classifiers for detecting deepfakes has improved with the releasing of ever larger datasets, but the understanding of why a particular video has been labelled as fake has not kept pace. In this work we develop, extend and compare white-box, black-box and model-specific techniques for explaining the labelling of real and fake videos. In particular, we adapt SHAP, GradCAM and self-attention models to the task of explaining the predictions of state-of-the-art detectors based on EfficientNet, trained on the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) dataset. We compare the obtained explanations, proposing metrics to quantify their visual features and desirable characteristics, and also perform a user survey collecting users' opinions regarding the usefulness of the explainers.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2021.

Builds on

27 of 39 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  8. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  9. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  10. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
  11. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  12. 2018Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentationscited by 558
15 more
  1. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
  2. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  3. 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 318
  4. 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 294
  5. 2019On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulationcited by 259
  6. 2018DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detectioncited by 208
  7. 2018Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videoscited by 180
  8. 2019Multi-task Learning For Detecting and Segmenting Manipulated Facial Images and Videoscited by 130
  9. 2019Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videoscited by 118
  10. 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
  11. 2018Learn To Pay Attentioncited by 83
  12. 2020DeepFake Detection by Analyzing Convolutional Tracescited by 81
  13. 2019BlazeFace: Sub-millisecond Neural Face Detection on Mobile GPUscited by 74
  14. 2020Video Face Manipulation Detection Through Ensemble of CNNscited by 63
  15. 2018In Ictu Oculi: Exposing AI Generated Fake Face Videos by Detecting Eye Blinkingcited by 54

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.