An adversarial attack approach for eXplainable AI evaluation on deepfake detection models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the rising concern on model interpretability, the application of eXplainable AI (XAI) tools on deepfake detection models has been a topic of interest recently. In image classification tasks, XAI tools highlight pixels influencing the decision given by a model. This helps in troubleshooting the model and determining areas that may require further tuning of parameters. With a wide range of tools available in the market, choosing the right tool for a model becomes necessary as each one may highlight different sets of pixels for a given image. There is a need to evaluate different tools and decide the best performing ones among them. Generic XAI evaluation methods like insertion or removal of salient pixels/segments are applicable for general image classification tasks but may produce less meaningful results when applied on deepfake detection models due to their functionality. In this paper, we perform experiments to show that generic removal/insertion XAI evaluation methods are not suitable for deepfake detection models. We also propose and implement an XAI evaluation approach specifically suited for deepfake detection models.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.
Builds on
30 of 40 references.
References · 30
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
18 more
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
- 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 321
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
- 2023TALL: Thumbnail Layout for Deepfake Video Detectioncited by 100
- 2021Spatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 88
- 2021Combining EfficientNet and Vision Transformers for Video Deepfake Detectioncited by 82
- 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
- 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
- 2020Adversarial Threats to DeepFake Detection: A Practical Perspectivecited by 48
- 2020IROF: a low resource evaluation metric for explanation methodscited by 46
- 2022Metrics for saliency map evaluation of deep learning explanation methodscited by 40
- 2022Explaining Deepfake Detection by Analysing Image Matchingcited by 34
- 2019Do Explanations Reflect Decisions? A Machine-centric Strategy to Quantify the Performance of Explainability Algorithmscited by 32
- 2022Saliency Attack: Towards Imperceptible Black-box Adversarial Attackcited by 12
- 2021Local Black-box Adversarial Attacks: A Query Efficient Approachcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024XAI-Based Detection of Adversarial Attacks on Deepfake Detectorscited by 9
- 2024Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detectioncited by 6
- 2025Improving the Perturbation-Based Explanation of Deepfake Detectors Through the Use of Adversarially-Generated Samplescited by 2
- 2025Extending Information Bottleneck Attribution to Video Sequencescited by 1
- 2025Realism to Deception: Investigating Deepfake Detectors Against Face Enhancementcited by 1
- 2025Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systemscited by 0
- 2026The Calibrated Deepfake Trust Score (CDTS): Competence-Coupled Trust Degradation Across Deepfake Detectorscited by 0
- 2026The Calibrated Deepfake Trust Score (CDTS): Competence-Coupled Trust Degradation Across Deepfake Detectors28 Jun 2026
- 2025Realism to Deception: Investigating Deepfake Detectors Against Face Enhancement8 Sep 2025
- 2025Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems24 Jul 2025
- 2025Improving the Perturbation-Based Explanation of Deepfake Detectors Through the Use of Adversarially-Generated Samples6 Feb 2025
- 2025Extending Information Bottleneck Attribution to Video Sequences28 Jan 2025
- 2024Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detection29 Apr 2024
- 2024XAI-Based Detection of Adversarial Attacks on Deepfake Detectors5 Mar 2024