Privilege Scores
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bias-transforming methods of fairness-aware machine learning aim to correct a non-neutral status quo with respect to a protected attribute (PA). Current methods, however, lack an explicit formulation of what drives non-neutrality. We introduce privilege scores (PS) to measure PA-related privilege by comparing the model predictions in the real world with those in a fair world in which the influence of the PA is removed. At the individual level, PS can identify individuals who qualify for affirmative action; at the global level, PS can inform bias-transforming policies. After presenting estimation methods for PS, we propose privilege score contributions (PSCs), an interpretation method that attributes the origin of privilege to mediating features and direct effects. We provide confidence intervals for both PS and PSCs. Experiments on simulated and real-world data demonstrate the broad applicability of our methods and provide novel insights into gender and racial privilege in mortgage and college admissions applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
28 of 55 references.
References · 28
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
- 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 191
- 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 179
- 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 171
- 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
- 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
- 2018Learning Optimal Fair Policiescited by 49
- 2023Causal normalizing flows: from theory to practicecited by 49
16 more
- 2017A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Marketcited by 44
- 2020Empirical observation of negligible fairness-accuracy trade-offs in machine learning for public policycited by 44
- 2022Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning -- An Overviewcited by 37
- 2023The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by defaultcited by 36
- 2019Fair Data Adaptation with Quantile Preservationcited by 29
- 2021Transport-based Counterfactual Modelscited by 27
- 2020Does enforcing fairness mitigate biases caused by subpopulation shift?cited by 25
- 2023Algorithmic Unfairness through the Lens of EU Non-Discrimination Law: Or Why the Law is not a Decision Treecited by 14
- 2022The Long Arc of Fairness: Formalisations and Ethical Discoursecited by 12
- 2024A Guide to Feature Importance Methods for Scientific Inferencecited by 11
- 2019Optimal Training of Fair Predictive Modelscited by 10
- 2023Counterfactual Situation Testing: Uncovering Discrimination under Fairness given the Differencecited by 8
- 2022What Is Fairness? On the Role of Protected Attributes and Fictitious Worldscited by 6
- 2025Overcoming Fairness Trade-offs via Pre-processing: A Causal Perspectivecited by 5
- 2023Causal Fair Machine Learning via Rank-Preserving Interventional Distributionscited by 4
- 2024Bridging Research and Practice Through Conversation: Reflecting on Our Experiencecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.