mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Algorithmic Unfairness through the Lens of EU Non-Discrimination Law: Or Why the Law is not a Decision Tree

arXiv 2305.13938 ↗First posted 5 May 2023cs.CY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concerns regarding unfairness and discrimination in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) systems have recently received increased attention from both legal and computer science scholars. Yet, the degree of overlap between notions of algorithmic bias and fairness on the one hand, and legal notions of discrimination and equality on the other, is often unclear, leading to misunderstandings between computer science and law. What types of bias and unfairness does the law address when it prohibits discrimination? What role can fairness metrics play in establishing legal compliance? In this paper, we aim to illustrate to what extent European Union (EU) non-discrimination law coincides with notions of algorithmic fairness proposed in computer science literature and where they differ. The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, we analyse seminal examples of algorithmic unfairness through the lens of EU non-discrimination law, drawing parallels with EU case law. Second, we set out the normative underpinnings of fairness metrics and technical interventions and compare these to the legal reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Specifically, we show how normative assumptions often remain implicit in both disciplinary approaches and explain the ensuing limitations of current AI practice and non-discrimination law. We conclude with implications for AI practitioners and regulators.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2023.

Builds on

13 of 97 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  5. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
  6. 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 308
  7. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 181
  8. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  9. 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81
  10. 2020On the Moral Justification of Statistical Paritycited by 30
  11. 2022The four-fifths rule is not disparate impact: a woeful tale of epistemic trespassing in algorithmic fairnesscited by 21
  12. 2022Equalizing Credit Opportunity in Algorithms: Aligning Algorithmic Fairness Research with U.S. Fair Lending Regulationcited by 9
1 more
  1. 2022Are There Exceptions to Goodhart's Law? On the Moral Justification of Fairness-Aware Machine Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: