Measuring the Data Efficiency of Deep Learning Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we propose a new experimental protocol and use it to benchmark the data efficiency --- performance as a function of training set size --- of two deep learning algorithms, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and hierarchical information-preserving graph-based slow feature analysis (HiGSFA), for tasks in classification and transfer learning scenarios. The algorithms are trained on different-sized subsets of the MNIST and Omniglot data sets. HiGSFA outperforms standard CNN networks when the models are trained on 50 and 200 samples per class for MNIST classification. In other cases, the CNNs perform better. The results suggest that there are cases where greedy, locally optimal bottom-up learning is equally or more powerful than global gradient-based learning.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Curriculum Learning for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 18
- 2021Reward prediction for representation learning and reward shapingcited by 3
- 2025Evaluation of Seismic Artificial Intelligence with Uncertaintycited by 3
- 2021Towards Sample-efficient Apprenticeship Learning from Suboptimal Demonstrationcited by 1
- 2022Semi-self-supervised Automated ICD Codingcited by 0
- 2025Evaluation of Seismic Artificial Intelligence with Uncertainty15 Jan 2025
- 2022Semi-self-supervised Automated ICD Coding20 May 2022
- 2021Curriculum Learning for Vision-and-Language Navigation14 Nov 2021
- 2021Towards Sample-efficient Apprenticeship Learning from Suboptimal Demonstration8 Oct 2021
- 2021Reward prediction for representation learning and reward shaping7 May 2021