Deep learning for seismic phase detection and picking in the aftershock zone of 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing volume of seismic data from long-term continuous monitoring motivates the development of algorithms based on convolutional neural network (CNN) for faster and more reliable phase detection and picking. However, many less studied regions lack a significant amount of labeled events needed for traditional CNN approaches. In this paper, we present a CNN-based Phase- Identification Classifier (CPIC) designed for phase detection and picking on small to medium sized training datasets. When trained on 30,146 labeled phases and applied to one-month of continuous recordings during the aftershock sequences of the 2008 MW 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake in Sichuan, China, CPIC detects 97.5% of the manually picked phases in the standard catalog and predicts their arrival times with a five-times improvement over the ObsPy AR picker. In addition, unlike other CNN-based approaches that require millions of training samples, when the off-line training set size of CPIC is reduced to only a few thousand training samples the accuracy stays above 95%. The online implementation of CPIC takes less than 12 hours to pick arrivals in 31-day recordings on 14 stations. In addition to the catalog phases manually picked by analysts, CPIC finds more phases for existing events and new events missed in the catalog. Among those additional detections, some are confirmed by a matched filter method while others require further investigation. Finally, when tested on a small dataset from a different region (Oklahoma, US), CPIC achieves 97% accuracy after fine tuning only the fully connected layer of the model. This result suggests that the CPIC developed in this study can be used to identify and pick P/S arrivals in other regions with no or minimum labeled phases.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extractioncited by 8
- 2025Evaluation of Seismic Artificial Intelligence with Uncertaintycited by 3
- 2021Towards fast machine-learning-assisted Bayesian posterior inference of microseismic event location and source mechanismcited by 1
- 2023Multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring: An all-in-one seismic Phase picking, Location, and Association Network (PLAN)cited by 1
- 2021Machine learning for Earth System Science (ESS): A survey, status and future directions for South Asiacited by 0
- 2023High-Rate Phase Association with Travel Time Neural Fieldscited by 0
- 2026GreenPhase: A Green Learning Approach for Earthquake Phase Pickingcited by 0
- 2026GreenPhase: A Green Learning Approach for Earthquake Phase Picking23 Feb 2026
- 2025Evaluation of Seismic Artificial Intelligence with Uncertainty15 Jan 2025
- 2023SeisCLIP: A seismology foundation model pre-trained by multi-modal data for multi-purpose seismic feature extraction5 Sep 2023
- 2023High-Rate Phase Association with Travel Time Neural Fields14 Jul 2023
- 2023Multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring: An all-in-one seismic Phase picking, Location, and Association Network (PLAN)24 Jun 2023
- 2021Machine learning for Earth System Science (ESS): A survey, status and future directions for South Asia24 Dec 2021
- 2021Towards fast machine-learning-assisted Bayesian posterior inference of microseismic event location and source mechanism12 Jan 2021