Explainable AI for microseismic event detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks like PhaseNet show high accuracy in detecting microseismic events, but their black-box nature is a concern in critical applications. We apply Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, such as Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), to interpret the PhaseNet model's decisions and improve its reliability. Grad-CAM highlights that the network's attention aligns with P- and S-wave arrivals. SHAP values quantify feature contributions, confirming that vertical-component amplitudes drive P-phase picks while horizontal components dominate S-phase picks, consistent with geophysical principles. Leveraging these insights, we introduce a SHAP-gated inference scheme that combines the model's output with an explanation-based metric to reduce errors. On a test set of 9,000 waveforms, the SHAP-gated model achieved an F1-score of 0.98 (precision 0.99, recall 0.97), outperforming the baseline PhaseNet (F1-score 0.97) and demonstrating enhanced robustness to noise. These results show that XAI can not only interpret deep learning models but also directly enhance their performance, providing a template for building trust in automated seismic detectors. The implementation and scripts used in this study will be publicly available at https://github.com/ayratabd/xAI_PhaseNet.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
4 of 24 references.
References · 4
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2025Evaluation of Seismic Artificial Intelligence with Uncertaintycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.