mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hallucination Mitigation using Agentic AI Natural Language-Based Frameworks

arXiv 2501.13946 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.MAcited by 12

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucinations remain a significant challenge in current Generative AI models, undermining trust in AI systems and their reliability. This study investigates how orchestrating multiple specialized Artificial Intelligent Agents can help mitigate such hallucinations, with a focus on systems leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) to facilitate seamless agent interactions. To achieve this, we design a pipeline that introduces over three hundred prompts, purposefully crafted to induce hallucinations, into a front-end agent. The outputs are then systematically reviewed and refined by second- and third-level agents, each employing distinct large language models and tailored strategies to detect unverified claims, incorporate explicit disclaimers, and clarify speculative content. Additionally, we introduce a set of novel Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) specifically designed to evaluate hallucination score levels. A dedicated fourth-level AI agent is employed to evaluate these KPIs, providing detailed assessments and ensuring accurate quantification of shifts in hallucination-related behaviors. A core component of this investigation is the use of the OVON (Open Voice Network) framework, which relies on universal NLP-based interfaces to transfer contextual information among agents. Through structured JSON messages, each agent communicates its assessment of the hallucination likelihood and the reasons underlying questionable content, thereby enabling the subsequent stage to refine the text without losing context. The results demonstrate that employing multiple specialized agents capable of interoperating with each other through NLP-based agentic frameworks can yield promising outcomes in hallucination mitigation, ultimately bolstering trust within the AI community.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2025.

Builds on

8 of 21 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Good Parenting is all you need -- Multi-agentic LLM Hallucination Mitigation18 Oct
  2. 2024Interpreting and Mitigating Hallucination in MLLMs through Multi-agent Debate30 Jul

Other references · 6

  1. 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 360
  2. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 329
  3. 2021Measuring Attribution in Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 253
  4. 2024Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interactioncited by 167
  5. 2024AI Multi-Agent Interoperability Extension for Managing Multiparty Conversationscited by 6
  6. 2024Conversational AI Multi-Agent Interoperability, Universal Open APIs for Agentic Natural Language Multimodal Communicationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 8.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs): An Application-Oriented Survey on RAG, Reasoning, and Agentic Systems
  2. 2025InEx: Hallucination Mitigation via Introspection and Cross-Modal Multi-Agent Collaboration
  3. 2026AgentHallu: Benchmarking Automated Hallucination Attribution of LLM-based Agents
  4. 2026Steering the Verifiability of Multimodal AI Hallucinations
  5. 2025HEAL: An Empirical Study on Hallucinations in Embodied Agents Driven by Large Language Models
  6. 2026HalluClear: Diagnosing, Evaluating and Mitigating Hallucinations in GUI Agents
  7. 2024Investigating the Role of Prompting and External Tools in Hallucination Rates of Large Language Models
  8. 2026Actionable Hallucination Detection: Translating Latent Uncertainty into Agentic Critique