mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Actionable Hallucination Detection: Translating Latent Uncertainty into Agentic Critique

arXiv 2608.10430 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed as AI agents frequently exhibit user specification-grounding failures, executing hallucinated, undesired actions to force a resolution rather than expressing uncertainty. Existing detection methods fail to provide actionable, real-time correction as they either do not localize the hallucinations, or incur prohibitive inference latency. We introduce the Latent Critic, a lightweight low-rank adapter (LoRA) that operates concurrently with a frozen base LLM's generation to actively restructure the transformer's residual stream---amplifying latent grounding signals and translating them into localized, natural language feedback within a single sequence. By refining the base model's native uncertainty signals, this manipulation of the latent space enables reliable, granular detection without the overhead of secondary inference loops. Mechanistic analysis via activation patching and layer-wise probing shows that this rank-invariant behavior restructures pre-existing uncertainty geometry into a linearly separable representation that transfers more reliably than base model representations alone. Using tool-calling as an instantiation of granular hallucinations, we validate the detection and downstream improvements enabled by the Latent Critic architecture across Qwen and Llama-based models. Demonstrating superior real-time efficacy, our approach significantly outperforms equivalent-scale fine-tuned external detectors, semantic entropy baselines, and passive internal probes in isolating hallucinations, achieving 0.966 AUROC and >80% accuracy in localization (e.g., ungrounded: date). When deployed in a closed-loop ReAct environment, the Critic acts as a negligible latency guardrail, intercepting hallucinations before execution to prevent undesired actions while simultaneously leveraging this specific localized feedback to enable efficient agent self-correction.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

30 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Internal Representations as Indicators of Hallucinations in Agent Tool Selection8 Jan

Other references · 29

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  4. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
  5. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  6. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
  7. 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
  8. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
  9. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
  10. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
  11. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 591
  12. 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 393
17 more
  1. 2023Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokenscited by 264
  2. 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 259
  3. 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 244
  4. 2024xLAM: A Family of Large Action Models to Empower AI Agent Systemscited by 111
  5. 2024Guiding LLMs The Right Way: Fast, Non-Invasive Constrained Generationcited by 101
  6. 2023Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMscited by 98
  7. 2024Unsupervised Real-Time Hallucination Detection based on the Internal States of Large Language Modelscited by 86
  8. 2024Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguitycited by 56
  9. 2025Structured Uncertainty guided Clarification for LLM Agentscited by 41
  10. 2025Ambig-SWE: Interactive Agents to Overcome Underspecificity in Software Engineeringcited by 38
  11. 2025Real-Time Detection of Hallucinated Entities in Long-Form Generationcited by 34
  12. 2024CLARINET: Augmenting Language Models to Ask Clarification Questions for Retrievalcited by 20
  13. 2025Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence Associationscited by 15
  14. 2026Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Taskscited by 4
  15. 2026Small Updates, Big Doubts: Does Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Enhance Hallucination Detection ?cited by 2
  16. 2025Efficient On-Device Agents via Adaptive Context Managementcited by 1
  17. 2026CORVUS: Red-Teaming Hallucination Detectors via Internal Signal Camouflage in Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MMD-Flagger: Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancy to Detect Hallucinations
  2. 2025Revisiting Hallucination Detection with Effective Rank-based Uncertainty
  3. 2026Lyapunov Probes for Hallucination Detection in Large Foundation Models
  4. 2026AgentHallu: Benchmarking Automated Hallucination Attribution of LLM-based Agents
  5. 2026Alleviating Hallucination in Reasoning Tasks with Training-Free Uncertainty-Guided Steering
  6. 2025A Single Direction of Truth: An Observer Model's Linear Residual Probe Exposes and Steers Contextual Hallucinations
  7. 2025LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directions
  8. 2025HEAL: An Empirical Study on Hallucinations in Embodied Agents Driven by Large Language Models