mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Creating Fair Models of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk

arXiv 1809.04663 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Guidelines for the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) recommend the use of risk stratification models to identify patients most likely to benefit from cholesterol-lowering and other therapies. These models have differential performance across race and gender groups with inconsistent behavior across studies, potentially resulting in an inequitable distribution of beneficial therapy. In this work, we leverage adversarial learning and a large observational cohort extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) to develop a "fair" ASCVD risk prediction model with reduced variability in error rates across groups. We empirically demonstrate that our approach is capable of aligning the distribution of risk predictions conditioned on the outcome across several groups simultaneously for models built from high-dimensional EHR data. We also discuss the relevance of these results in the context of the empirical trade-off between fairness and model performance.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 7; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 5.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifierscited by 52
  2. 2021Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcarecited by 21
  3. 2021Fairness On The Ground: Applying Algorithmic Fairness Approaches to Production Systemscited by 20
  4. 2023Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methodscited by 17
  5. 2022Net benefit, calibration, threshold selection, and training objectives for algorithmic fairness in healthcarecited by 16
  6. 2021A comparison of approaches to improve worst-case predictive model performance over patient subpopulationscited by 12
  7. 2023On (assessing) the fairness of risk score modelscited by 12
  8. 2021Fair Representations by Compressioncited by 7
  9. 2023Evaluating the Impact of Social Determinants on Health Prediction in the Intensive Care Unitcited by 7
  10. 2022When Personalization Harms: Reconsidering the Use of Group Attributes in Predictioncited by 6
  11. 2022Imputation Strategies Under Clinical Presence: Impact on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 6
  12. 2024What is Fair? Defining Fairness in Machine Learning for Healthcited by 5
11 more
  1. 2025MedEqualizer: A Framework Investigating Bias in Synthetic Medical Data and Mitigation via Augmentationcited by 3
  2. 2023MLHOps: Machine Learning for Healthcare Operationscited by 2
  3. 2023Model Debiasing via Gradient-based Explanation on Representationcited by 2
  4. 2025Enhancing Multi-Attribute Fairness in Healthcare Predictive Modelingcited by 2
  5. 2025Critical Appraisal of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Predictive AIcited by 2
  6. 2022SoFaiR: Single Shot Fair Representation Learningcited by 1
  7. 2022Classification Utility, Fairness, and Compactness via Tunable Information Bottleneck and R'enyi Measurescited by 1
  8. 2025Can SAEs reveal and mitigate racial biases of LLMs in healthcare?cited by 1
  9. 2022Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Reviewcited by 0
  10. 2023Counterpart Fairness -- Addressing Systematic between-group Differences in Fairness Evaluationcited by 0
  11. 2025seeBias: A Comprehensive Tool for Assessing and Visualizing AI Fairnesscited by 0