mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Influence-based Instruction Tuning Data Selection for Balanced Learning of Diverse Capabilities

arXiv 2501.12147 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Selecting appropriate training data is crucial for instruction fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), which aims to (1) elicit strong capabilities, and (2) achieve balanced performance across different tasks. Influence-based methods show promise in achieving (1), by estimating the contribution of each training example to the model's predictions, but often struggle with (2). Our systematic investigation reveals that this underperformance can be attributed to an inherent bias, where some tasks intrinsically have greater influence than others. As a result, data selection is often biased towards these tasks, not only hurting the model's performance on others but also, counterintuitively, harming performance on these high-influence tasks themselves. To address this, we propose BIDS, a Balanced and Influential Data Selection algorithm. BIDS first normalizes influence scores of the training data, and then iteratively chooses the training example with the highest influence on the most underrepresented task. Experiments with both Llama-3 and Mistral-v0.3 on seven benchmarks spanning five diverse capabilities show that BIDS consistently outperforms both state-of-the-art influence-based algorithms and other non-influence-based frameworks. Surprisingly, training on a 15% subset selected by BIDS can even outperform full-dataset training with a much more balanced performance. Our analysis highlights the importance of both instance-level normalization and iterative optimization of selected data for balanced learning of diverse capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2025.

Builds on

47 of 70 references.

References · 47

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  7. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  8. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  9. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  10. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  11. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  12. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
35 more
  1. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  2. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  3. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  4. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  5. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
  6. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  7. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  8. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  9. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
  10. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
  11. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  12. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
  13. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 230
  14. 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 191
  15. 2017Controlling Linguistic Style Aspects in Neural Language Generationcited by 147
  16. 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 134
  17. 2024DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodelscited by 103
  18. 2024MATES: Model-Aware Data Selection for Efficient Pretraining with Data Influence Modelscited by 96
  19. 2024What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functionscited by 88
  20. 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 83
  21. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  22. 2024SmallToLarge (S2L): Scalable Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models by Summarizing Training Trajectories of Small Modelscited by 43
  23. 2024EDT: Improving Large Language Models' Generation by Entropy-based Dynamic Temperature Samplingcited by 42
  24. 2022First is Better Than Last for Language Data Influencecited by 34
  25. 2024Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influencecited by 34
  26. 2024Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language Modelscited by 32
  27. 2024Get more for less: Principled Data Selection for Warming Up Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 32
  28. 2024G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based Diverse and High-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine Translationcited by 29
  29. 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Modelscited by 29
  30. 2024Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating Systemscited by 26
  31. 2024SelectLLM: Can LLMs Select Important Instructions to Annotate?cited by 16
  32. 2024The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passescited by 16
  33. 2024Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimationcited by 13
  34. 2023Decoding Data Quality via Synthetic Corruptions: Embedding-guided Pruning of Code Datacited by 12
  35. 2024Chasing Random: Instruction Selection Strategies Fail to Generalizecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 15.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 48
  2. 2025Large-Scale Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 34
  3. 2025DATE-LM: Benchmarking Data Attribution Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 5
  4. 2025Forgetting: A New Mechanism Towards Better Large Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 4
  5. 2025TRIM: Token-wise Attention-Derived Saliency for Data-Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 3
  6. 2025Measuring Fine-Grained Relatedness in Multitask Learning via Data Attributioncited by 1
  7. 2025Learning Task Mixtures from Task Affinities: A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 1
  8. 2026Interaction-Aware Influence Functions for Group Attributioncited by 1
  9. 2026SEED: Targeted Data Selection by Weighted Independent Setcited by 1
  10. 2026PRISM: Preference-Aware Influence Function Based Data Selection Method for Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 1
  11. 2026Form Over Content In Gradient-Based Data Attribution Methodscited by 1
  12. 2026Convex Dataset Valuation for Post-Trainingcited by 0
10 more
  1. 2026SafeLens: Deliberate and Efficient Video Guardrails with Fast-and-Slow Screeningcited by 0
  2. 2026MADS: Model-Aware Diverse Core Set Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 0
  3. 2026Unifying Data, Memory, and Compute Efficiency in LLM training: A Surveycited by 0
  4. 2026PPL-Factory: Task-Aware and Budget-Aware Data Selection from Language Modeling to Reasoningcited by 0
  5. 2026Emergent Misalignment Is Not Magicalcited by 0
  6. 2026Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Studycited by 0
  7. 2026Which Influence Are We Estimating? The Role of Counterfactual Specifications in Data Attributioncited by 0
  8. 2026Refreshing Less, Selecting Better: Reusing Stale Gradient Features for Efficient Influence-Based Data Selectioncited by 0
  9. 2026Selecting Diverse SFT Traces Improves Post-RL Generalizationcited by 0
  10. 2026Overcoming Prior Barriers: Supervised Fine-Tuning under Long-Tail Distributioncited by 0