Interaction-Aware Influence Functions for Group Attribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Influence functions approximate how removing a training example changes a quantity of interest, called the target function, such as a held-out loss. To estimate the influence of a group of examples, the standard practice is to sum the individual influences of its members. However, this sum does not capture how examples jointly affect the target: a pair of examples may be redundant or complementary, but the sum cannot distinguish these cases. We propose an interaction-aware influence function that characterizes how interactions between examples influence the target. By expanding the target to second order around the trained parameters, we obtain an estimator that augments the standard sum with a pairwise interaction term that captures the alignment between two examples' effects on the target. We empirically evaluate our estimator in two settings. First, on six dataset-model pairs spanning logistic regression, MLPs, and ResNet-9, our estimator tracks leave-group-out retraining substantially better than first-order influence across all settings. Second, when used as a greedy selection rule for instruction-tuning data on Llama-3.1-8B, it beats prior influence-based and representation-similarity baselines on five of seven downstream tasks, in a regime where standard influence-based selection underperforms random selection.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
57 of 66 references.
References · 57
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 650
38 more
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 579
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2024NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Modelscited by 472
- 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 443
- 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 432
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 252
- 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 147
- 2018Fast Approximate Natural Gradient Descent in a Kronecker-factored Eigenbasiscited by 146
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 144
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
- 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
- 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 123
- 2024DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodelscited by 105
- 2024MATES: Model-Aware Data Selection for Efficient Pretraining with Data Influence Modelscited by 100
- 2024What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functionscited by 94
- 2019On Second-Order Group Influence Functions for Black-Box Predictionscited by 79
- 2024SmallToLarge (S2L): Scalable Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models by Summarizing Training Trajectories of Small Modelscited by 44
- 2019Semantic Redundancies in Image-Classification Datasets: The 10% You Don't Needcited by 43
- 2024Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model Pretrainingcited by 42
- 2025Large-Scale Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 35
- 2024Harnessing Diversity for Important Data Selection in Pretraining Large Language Modelscited by 34
- 2024Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Modelscited by 33
- 2024Most Influential Subset Selection: Challenges, Promises, and Beyondcited by 32
- 2024G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based Diverse and High-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine Translationcited by 30
- 2024Rethinking Data Shapley for Data Selection Tasks: Misleads and Meritscited by 29
- 2022Understanding Influence Functions and Datamodels via Harmonic Analysiscited by 23
- 2025Improving Influence-based Instruction Tuning Data Selection for Balanced Learning of Diverse Capabilitiescited by 23
- 2025Efficient Data Selection at Scale via Influence Distillationcited by 15
- 2025Data Pruning by Information Maximizationcited by 15
- 2025Bayesian Influence Functions for Hessian-Free Data Attributioncited by 14
- 2025Group-Level Data Selection for Efficient Pretrainingcited by 13
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.