Bridging the Communication Gap: Evaluating AI Labeling Practices for Trustworthy AI Development
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes integral to economy and society, communication gaps between developers, users, and stakeholders hinder trust and informed decision-making. High-level AI labels, inspired by frameworks like EU energy labels, have been proposed to make the properties of AI models more transparent. Without requiring deep technical expertise, they can inform on the trade-off between predictive performance and resource efficiency. However, the practical benefits and limitations of AI labeling remain underexplored. This study evaluates AI labeling through qualitative interviews along four key research questions. Based on thematic analysis and inductive coding, we found a broad range of practitioners to be interested in AI labeling (RQ1). They see benefits for alleviating communication gaps and aiding non-expert decision-makers, however limitations, misunderstandings, and suggestions for improvement were also discussed (RQ2). Compared to other reporting formats, interviewees positively evaluated the reduced complexity of labels, increasing overall comprehensibility (RQ3). Trust was influenced most by usability and the credibility of the responsible labeling authority, with mixed preferences for self-certification versus third-party certification (RQ4). Our Insights highlight that AI labels pose a trade-off between simplicity and complexity, which could be resolved by developing customizable and interactive labeling frameworks to address diverse user needs. Transparent labeling of resource efficiency also nudged interviewee priorities towards paying more attention to sustainability aspects during AI development. This study validates AI labels as a valuable tool for enhancing trust and communication in AI, offering actionable guidelines for their refinement and standardization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2025.
Builds on
22 of 64 references.
References · 22
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
- 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 186
- 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
- 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
- 2019The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 100
10 more
- 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
- 2022Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentationcited by 61
- 2021How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Studycited by 29
- 2023Exploring the Carbon Footprint of Hugging Face's ML Models: A Repository Mining Studycited by 23
- 2023A Meta-Summary of Challenges in Building Products with ML Components -- Collecting Experiences from 4758+ Practitionerscited by 22
- 2022Explainable AI via Learning to Optimizecited by 14
- 2021Yes We Care! -- Certification for Machine Learning Methods through the Care Label Frameworkcited by 5
- 2023Certification Labels for Trustworthy AI: Insights From an Empirical Mixed-Method Studycited by 5
- 2024GAISSALabel: A tool for energy labeling of ML modelscited by 3
- 2018Dependability in a Multi-tenant Multi-framework Deep Learning as-a-Service Platformcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.