mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Yes We Care! -- Certification for Machine Learning Methods through the Care Label Framework

arXiv 2105.10197 ↗First posted 21 May 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning applications have become ubiquitous. Their applications range from embedded control in production machines over process optimization in diverse areas (e.g., traffic, finance, sciences) to direct user interactions like advertising and recommendations. This has led to an increased effort of making machine learning trustworthy. Explainable and fair AI have already matured. They address the knowledgeable user and the application engineer. However, there are users that want to deploy a learned model in a similar way as their washing machine. These stakeholders do not want to spend time in understanding the model, but want to rely on guaranteed properties. What are the relevant properties? How can they be expressed to the stakeholder without presupposing machine learning knowledge? How can they be guaranteed for a certain implementation of a machine learning model? These questions move far beyond the current state of the art and we want to address them here. We propose a unified framework that certifies learning methods via care labels. They are easy to understand and draw inspiration from well-known certificates like textile labels or property cards of electronic devices. Our framework considers both, the machine learning theory and a given implementation. We test the implementation's compliance with theoretical properties and bounds.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2021.

Builds on

17 of 73 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  5. 2019Green AIcited by 627
  6. 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 470
  7. 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 249
  8. 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 185
  9. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 165
  10. 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
  11. 2013Loopy Belief Propagation for Approximate Inference: An Empirical Studycited by 76
  12. 2019A Comprehensive Study on Deep Learning Bug Characteristicscited by 65
5 more
  1. 2020A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systemscited by 45
  2. 2021Inspect, Understand, Overcome: A Survey of Practical Methods for AI Safetycited by 35
  3. 2019Experiences with Improving the Transparency of AI Models and Servicescited by 14
  4. 2019MLSys: The New Frontier of Machine Learning Systemscited by 4
  5. 2020Resource-Constrained On-Device Learning by Dynamic Averagingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

5 papers.