mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Re-Ranking with a Corpus Graph

arXiv 2208.08942 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2022cs.IRcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Search systems often employ a re-ranking pipeline, wherein documents (or passages) from an initial pool of candidates are assigned new ranking scores. The process enables the use of highly-effective but expensive scoring functions that are not suitable for use directly in structures like inverted indices or approximate nearest neighbour indices. However, re-ranking pipelines are inherently limited by the recall of the initial candidate pool; documents that are not identified as candidates for re-ranking by the initial retrieval function cannot be identified. We propose a novel approach for overcoming the recall limitation based on the well-established clustering hypothesis. Throughout the re-ranking process, our approach adds documents to the pool that are most similar to the highest-scoring documents up to that point. This feedback process adapts the pool of candidates to those that may also yield high ranking scores, even if they were not present in the initial pool. It can also increase the score of documents that appear deeper in the pool that would have otherwise been skipped due to a limited re-ranking budget. We find that our Graph-based Adaptive Re-ranking (GAR) approach significantly improves the performance of re-ranking pipelines in terms of precision- and recall-oriented measures, is complementary to a variety of existing techniques (e.g., dense retrieval), is robust to its hyperparameters, and contributes minimally to computational and storage costs. For instance, on the MS MARCO passage ranking dataset, GAR can improve the nDCG of a BM25 candidate pool by up to 8% when applying a monoT5 ranker.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Lossescited by 115
  2. 2024Ranked List Truncation for Large Language Model-based Re-Rankingcited by 20
  3. 2025Guiding Retrieval using LLM-based Listwise Rankerscited by 16
  4. 2024Improving Retrieval in Theme-specific Applications using a Corpus Topical Taxonomycited by 11
  5. 2025Scientific Paper Retrieval with LLM-Guided Semantic-Based Rankingcited by 10
  6. 2023Lexically-Accelerated Dense Retrievalcited by 7
  7. 2025Beyond Sequential Reranking: Reranker-Guided Search Improves Reasoning Intensive Retrievalcited by 5
  8. 2024Shallow Cross-Encoders for Low-Latency Retrievalcited by 4
  9. 2025LLM-guided Hierarchical Search for End-to-end Reasoning Intensive Retrievalcited by 4
  10. 2025Test-time Corpus Feedback: From Retrieval to RAGcited by 3
  11. 2023Combining Deep Neural Reranking and Unsupervised Extraction for Multi-Query Focused Summarizationcited by 2
  12. 2022Query-Specific Knowledge Graphs for Complex Finance Topicscited by 1
11 more
  1. 2024Adaptive Retrieval and Scalable Indexing for k-NN Search with Cross-Encoderscited by 1
  2. 2024Predicting from a Different Perspective: A Re-ranking Model for Inductive Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 1
  3. 2025Efficient Sketching and Nearest Neighbor Search Algorithms for Sparse Vector Setscited by 1
  4. 2025SpIDER: Spatially Informed Dense Embedding Retrieval for Software Issue Localizationcited by 1
  5. 2026R3-SQL: Ranking Reward and Resampling for Text-to-SQLcited by 1
  6. 2023Online Distillation for Pseudo-Relevance Feedbackcited by 0
  7. 2026GraFine: Retrieval-Time Refinement for Efficient Graph RAG over Corpus Graphscited by 0
  8. 2026PLAID-PRF: Pseudo-Relevance Feedback with Centroid-like Tokens in PLAIDcited by 0
  9. 2026Local-to-Global Sentence-Level Graph Reranking for Scientific Synthesiscited by 0
  10. 2026ABAI at COLIEE 2026 Task 1: Multi-Stage Retrieval with GraphRAG-Enhanced Meta-Learning, and a Post-Hoc Study of the Cross-Validation-to-Test Gapcited by 0
  11. 2026BoundaryMORPH: Budgeted Reranking via Active Set Selection for Diffuse Retrievalcited by 0