Lexically-Accelerated Dense Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval approaches that score documents based on learned dense vectors (i.e., dense retrieval) rather than lexical signals (i.e., conventional retrieval) are increasingly popular. Their ability to identify related documents that do not necessarily contain the same terms as those appearing in the user's query (thereby improving recall) is one of their key advantages. However, to actually achieve these gains, dense retrieval approaches typically require an exhaustive search over the document collection, making them considerably more expensive at query-time than conventional lexical approaches. Several techniques aim to reduce this computational overhead by approximating the results of a full dense retriever. Although these approaches reasonably approximate the top results, they suffer in terms of recall -- one of the key advantages of dense retrieval. We introduce 'LADR' (Lexically-Accelerated Dense Retrieval), a simple-yet-effective approach that improves the efficiency of existing dense retrieval models without compromising on retrieval effectiveness. LADR uses lexical retrieval techniques to seed a dense retrieval exploration that uses a document proximity graph. We explore two variants of LADR: a proactive approach that expands the search space to the neighbors of all seed documents, and an adaptive approach that selectively searches the documents with the highest estimated relevance in an iterative fashion. Through extensive experiments across a variety of dense retrieval models, we find that LADR establishes a new dense retrieval effectiveness-efficiency Pareto frontier among approximate k nearest neighbor techniques. Further, we find that when tuned to take around 8ms per query in retrieval latency on our hardware, LADR consistently achieves both precision and recall that are on par with an exhaustive search on standard benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2023.
Builds on
23 of 56 references.
References · 23
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 853
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
- 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 283
- 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 282
- 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 266
- 2021Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Samplingcited by 238
- 2021Overview of the TREC 2020 deep learning trackcited by 193
- 2017A Deep Relevance Matching Model for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 126
- 2022RetroMAE: Pre-Training Retrieval-oriented Language Models Via Masked Auto-Encodercited by 118
11 more
- 2020Leveraging Semantic and Lexical Matching to Improve the Recall of Document Retrieval Systems: A Hybrid Approachcited by 31
- 2020Expansion via Prediction of Importance with Contextualizationcited by 26
- 2020Learning Optimal Tree Models Under Beam Searchcited by 26
- 2022Adaptive Re-Ranking with a Corpus Graphcited by 23
- 2021Predicting Efficiency/Effectiveness Trade-offs for Dense vs. Sparse Retrieval Strategy Selectioncited by 15
- 2021Joint Learning of Deep Retrieval Model and Product Quantization based Embedding Indexcited by 11
- 2016A Study of MatchPyramid Models on Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 6
- 2022Faster Learned Sparse Retrieval with Guided Traversalcited by 5
- 2022Composite Code Sparse Autoencoders for first stage retrievalcited by 4
- 2021Efficient Neural Ranking using Forward Indexescited by 3
- 2020Multi-Perspective Semantic Information Retrievalcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2025Guiding Retrieval using LLM-based Listwise Rankerscited by 16
- 2024Improving Retrieval in Theme-specific Applications using a Corpus Topical Taxonomycited by 11
- 2024A Reproducibility Study of PLAIDcited by 8
- 2024Shallow Cross-Encoders for Low-Latency Retrievalcited by 4
- 2025QDER: Query-Specific Document and Entity Representations for Multi-Vector Document Re-Rankingcited by 1
- 2025Democratizing GraphRAG: Linear, CPU-Only Graph Retrieval for Multi-Hop QAcited by 0
- 2026PLAID-PRF: Pseudo-Relevance Feedback with Centroid-like Tokens in PLAIDcited by 0
- 2026PLAID-PRF: Pseudo-Relevance Feedback with Centroid-like Tokens in PLAID21 Jul 2026
- 2025Democratizing GraphRAG: Linear, CPU-Only Graph Retrieval for Multi-Hop QA27 Dec 2025
- 2025QDER: Query-Specific Document and Entity Representations for Multi-Vector Document Re-Ranking13 Oct 2025
- 2025Guiding Retrieval using LLM-based Listwise Rankers15 Jan 2025
- 2024A Reproducibility Study of PLAID23 Apr 2024
- 2024Shallow Cross-Encoders for Low-Latency Retrieval29 Mar 2024
- 2024Improving Retrieval in Theme-specific Applications using a Corpus Topical Taxonomy7 Mar 2024