Safe Multiagent Coordination via Entropic Exploration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many real-world multiagent learning problems involve safety concerns. In these setups, typical safe reinforcement learning algorithms constrain agents' behavior, limiting exploration -- a crucial component for discovering effective cooperative multiagent behaviors. Moreover, the multiagent literature typically models individual constraints for each agent and has yet to investigate the benefits of using joint team constraints. In this work, we analyze these team constraints from a theoretical and practical perspective and propose entropic exploration for constrained multiagent reinforcement learning (E2C) to address the exploration issue. E2C leverages observation entropy maximization to incentivize exploration and facilitate learning safe and effective cooperative behaviors. Experiments across increasingly complex domains show that E2C agents match or surpass common unconstrained and constrained baselines in task performance while reducing unsafe behaviors by up to 50%.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2024.
Builds on
25 of 45 references.
References · 25
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
- 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 597
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
- 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 309
13 more
- 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 270
- 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 263
- 2020Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategiescited by 212
- 2015Multiagent Cooperation and Competition with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 184
- 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 175
- 2021Behavior From the Void: Unsupervised Active Pre-Trainingcited by 174
- 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 116
- 2018Diversity-Driven Exploration Strategy for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2021Multi-Agent Constrained Policy Optimisationcited by 35
- 2021Direct Behavior Specification via Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
- 2021Centralizing State-Values in Dueling Networks for Multi-Robot Reinforcement Learning Mapless Navigationcited by 13
- 2022Trust Region Bounds for Decentralized PPO Under Non-stationaritycited by 11
- 2023Reinforcement Learning by Guided Safe Explorationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SafeDiSTL: Decomposing Joint Constraints for Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Coordination Graphs for Constrained Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2025A Survey of Safe Reinforcement Learning and Constrained MDPs: A Technical Survey on Single-Agent and Multi-Agent Safety
- 2026Scalable Constrained Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via State Augmentation and Consensus for Separable Dynamics
- 2024A Safe Exploration Strategy for Model-free Task Adaptation in Safety-constrained Grid Environments
- 2024Multi-agent cooperation through learning-aware policy gradients
- 2026Co2PO: Coordinated Constrained Policy Optimization for Multi-Agent RL
- 2025Topology Enhanced MARL for Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making of CAVs