mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MOPO: Multi-Objective Prompt Optimization for Affective Text Generation

arXiv 2412.12948 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2024cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How emotions are expressed depends on the context and domain. On X (formerly Twitter), for instance, an author might simply use the hashtag #anger, while in a news headline, emotions are typically written in a more polite, indirect manner. To enable conditional text generation models to create emotionally connotated texts that fit a domain, users need to have access to a parameter that allows them to choose the appropriate way to express an emotion. To achieve this, we introduce MOPO, a Multi-Objective Prompt Optimization methodology. MOPO optimizes prompts according to multiple objectives (which correspond here to the output probabilities assigned by emotion classifiers trained for different domains). In contrast to single objective optimization, MOPO outputs a set of prompts, each with a different weighting of the multiple objectives. Users can then choose the most appropriate prompt for their context. We evaluate MOPO using three objectives, determined by various domain-specific emotion classifiers. MOPO improves performance by up to 15 pp across all objectives with a minimal loss (1-2 pp) for any single objective compared to single-objective optimization. These minor performance losses are offset by a broader generalization across multiple objectives - which is not possible with single-objective optimization. Additionally, MOPO reduces computational requirements by simultaneously optimizing for multiple objectives, eliminating separate optimization procedures for each objective.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.

Builds on

22 of 45 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  5. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  6. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 361
  7. 2021Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 278
  8. 2021Knowledgeable Prompt-tuning: Incorporating Knowledge into Prompt Verbalizer for Text Classificationcited by 183
  9. 2017Emotional Chatting Machine: Emotional Conversation Generation with Internal and External Memorycited by 167
  10. 2021OpenPrompt: An Open-source Framework for Prompt-learningcited by 148
  11. 2021Planning with Learned Entity Prompts for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 75
  12. 2023WikiChat: Stopping the Hallucination of Large Language Model Chatbots by Few-Shot Grounding on Wikipediacited by 67
10 more
  1. 2018Polite Dialogue Generation Without Parallel Datacited by 57
  2. 2017Affect-LM: A Neural Language Model for Customizable Affective Text Generationcited by 50
  3. 2019Affect-Driven Dialog Generationcited by 50
  4. 2020CoCon: A Self-Supervised Approach for Controlled Text Generationcited by 47
  5. 2021Towards Efficient NLP: A Standard Evaluation and A Strong Baselinecited by 44
  6. 2023Towards Higher Pareto Frontier in Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 9
  7. 2020Facts2Story: Controlling Text Generation by Key Factscited by 7
  8. 2023Emotion-Conditioned Text Generation through Automatic Prompt Optimizationcited by 6
  9. 2023Breeding Machine Translations: Evolutionary approach to survive and thrive in the world of automated evaluationcited by 5
  10. 2023Affective Natural Language Generation of Event Descriptions through Fine-grained Appraisal Conditionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.