mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Affective Natural Language Generation of Event Descriptions through Fine-grained Appraisal Conditions

arXiv 2307.14004 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2023cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Models for affective text generation have shown a remarkable progress, but they commonly rely only on basic emotion theories or valance/arousal values as conditions. This is appropriate when the goal is to create explicit emotion statements ("The kid is happy."). Emotions are, however, commonly communicated implicitly. For instance, the emotional interpretation of an event ("Their dog died.") does often not require an explicit emotion statement. In psychology, appraisal theories explain the link between a cognitive evaluation of an event and the potentially developed emotion. They put the assessment of the situation on the spot, for instance regarding the own control or the responsibility for what happens. We hypothesize and subsequently show that including appraisal variables as conditions in a generation framework comes with two advantages. (1) The generation model is informed in greater detail about what makes a specific emotion and what properties it has. This leads to text generation that better fulfills the condition. (2) The variables of appraisal allow a user to perform a more fine-grained control of the generated text, by stating properties of a situation instead of only providing the emotion category. Our Bart and T5-based experiments with 7 emotions (Anger, Disgust, Fear, Guilt, Joy, Sadness, Shame), and 7 appraisals (Attention, Responsibility, Control, Circumstance, Pleasantness, Effort, Certainty) show that (1) adding appraisals during training improves the accurateness of the generated texts by 10 pp in F1. Further, (2) the texts with appraisal variables are longer and contain more details. This exemplifies the greater control for users.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.

Builds on

18 of 42 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  6. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  7. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  8. 2017Emotional Chatting Machine: Emotional Conversation Generation with Internal and External Memorycited by 167
  9. 2018Polite Dialogue Generation Without Parallel Datacited by 59
  10. 2017Affect-LM: A Neural Language Model for Customizable Affective Text Generationcited by 50
  11. 2019Affect-Driven Dialog Generationcited by 50
  12. 2020CoCon: A Self-Supervised Approach for Controlled Text Generationcited by 47
6 more
  1. 2022Dimensional Modeling of Emotions in Text with Appraisal Theories: Corpus Creation, Annotation Reliability, and Predictioncited by 46
  2. 2020Appraisal Theories for Emotion Classification in Textcited by 28
  3. 2019Crowdsourcing and Validating Event-focused Emotion Corpora for German and Englishcited by 25
  4. 2021Emotion Recognition under Consideration of the Emotion Component Process Modelcited by 12
  5. 2022x-enVENT: A Corpus of Event Descriptions with Experiencer-specific Emotion and Appraisal Annotationscited by 8
  6. 2020Facts2Story: Controlling Text Generation by Key Factscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

4 papers.