mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Defending LVLMs Against Vision Attacks through Partial-Perception Supervision

arXiv 2412.12722 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CRcited by 7

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies have raised significant concerns regarding the vulnerability of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) to maliciously injected or perturbed input images, which can mislead their responses. Existing defense methods show that such vision attacks are sensitive to image modifications especially cropping, using majority voting across responses of modified images as corrected responses. However, these modifications often result in partial images and distort the semantics, which reduces response quality on clean images after voting. Instead of directly using responses from partial images for voting, we investigate using them to supervise the LVLM's responses to the original images. We propose a black-box, training-free method called DPS (Defense through Partial-Perception Supervision). In this approach, the model is prompted using the responses generated by a model that perceives only a partial image. With DPS, the model can adjust its response based on partial image understanding when under attack, while confidently maintaining its original response for clean input. Our findings show that the weak model can supervise the strong model: when faced with an attacked input, the strong model becomes less confident and adjusts its response based on the weak model's partial understanding, effectively defending against the attack. With clean input, it confidently maintains its original response. Empirical experiments show our method outperforms the baseline, cutting the average attack success rate by 76.3% across six datasets on three popular models.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 42 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.

Builds on

42 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 19

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SceneTAP: Scene-Coherent Typographic Adversarial Planner against Vision-Language Models in Real-World Environments28 Nov
  2. 2024Unraveling and Mitigating Safety Alignment Degradation of Vision-Language Models11 Oct
  3. 2024VLMGuard: Bootstrapping Malicious Prompt Detectors from Unlabeled Vision-Language Prompts in the Wild1 Oct
  4. 2024MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models13 Jun
  5. 2024Safeguarding Vision-Language Models Against Patched Visual Prompt Injectors17 May
  6. 2024Images are Achilles' Heel of Alignment: Exploiting Visual Vulnerabilities for Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models14 Mar
  7. 2024Eyes Closed, Safety On: Protecting Multimodal LLMs via Image-to-Text Transformation14 Mar
  8. 2024AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting14 Mar
  9. 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models4 Mar
  10. 2024Unveiling Typographic Deceptions: Insights of the Typographic Vulnerability in Large Vision-Language Model29 Feb
  11. 2024Vision-LLMs Can Fool Themselves with Self-Generated Typographic Attacks1 Feb
  12. 2024Red Teaming Visual Language Models23 Jan
7 more
  1. 2024MLLM-Protector: Ensuring MLLM's Safety without Hurting Performance5 Jan
  2. 2023MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models29 Nov
  3. 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Prompts9 Nov
  4. 2023Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Models26 Jul
  5. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models22 Jun
  6. 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models26 May
  7. 2023Defense-Prefix for Preventing Typographic Attacks on CLIP10 Apr

Other references · 23

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  4. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  5. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  6. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
  7. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  8. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  9. 2024DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 482
  10. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 469
  11. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
  12. 2023Towards Generalist Biomedical AIcited by 286
11 more
  1. 2024Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answerscited by 255
  2. 2024Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language Modelscited by 160
  3. 2024Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Modelscited by 100
  4. 2024PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safetycited by 79
  5. 2023Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 65
  6. 2023JailGuard: A Universal Detection Framework for LLM Prompt-based Attackscited by 46
  7. 2024Compromising Embodied Agents with Contextual Backdoor Attackscited by 29
  8. 2024Vision Superalignment: Weak-to-Strong Generalization for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 28
  9. 2024Towards Transferable Attacks Against Vision-LLMs in Autonomous Driving with Typographycited by 17
  10. 2024Interpreting and Mitigating Hallucination in MLLMs through Multi-agent Debatecited by 16
  11. 2024Your Large Language Model is Secretly a Fairness Proponent and You Should Prompt it Like Onecited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Structure-Guided Visual Perturbation Neutralization for LVLMs
  2. 2025BackdoorVLM: A Benchmark for Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends
  4. 2024Break the Visual Perception: Adversarial Attacks Targeting Encoded Visual Tokens of Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Breaking the weakest link to evade vision language models
  6. 2025Robust Anti-Backdoor Instruction Tuning in LVLMs
  7. 2025Safeguarding Vision-Language Models: Mitigating Vulnerabilities to Gaussian Noise in Perturbation-based Attacks
  8. 2025A Survey of Safety on Large Vision-Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations