mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safeguarding Vision-Language Models: Mitigating Vulnerabilities to Gaussian Noise in Perturbation-based Attacks

arXiv 2504.01308 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2025cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) extend the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating visual information, yet they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, especially when processing noisy or corrupted images. Although existing VLMs adopt security measures during training to mitigate such attacks, vulnerabilities associated with noise-augmented visual inputs are overlooked. In this work, we identify that missing noise-augmented training causes critical security gaps: many VLMs are susceptible to even simple perturbations such as Gaussian noise. To address this challenge, we propose Robust-VLGuard, a multimodal safety dataset with aligned / misaligned image-text pairs, combined with noise-augmented fine-tuning that reduces attack success rates while preserving functionality of VLM. For stronger optimization-based visual perturbation attacks, we propose DiffPure-VLM, leveraging diffusion models to convert adversarial perturbations into Gaussian-like noise, which can be defended by VLMs with noise-augmented safety fine-tuning. Experimental results demonstrate that the distribution-shifting property of diffusion model aligns well with our fine-tuned VLMs, significantly mitigating adversarial perturbations across varying intensities. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/JarvisUSTC/DiffPure-RobustVLM.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.

Builds on

45 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024VLMGuard: Bootstrapping Malicious Prompt Detectors from Unlabeled Vision-Language Prompts in the Wild1 Oct
  2. 2024JailbreakZoo: Survey, Landscapes, and Horizons in Jailbreaking Large Language and Vision-Language Models26 Jun
  3. 2024Safeguarding Vision-Language Models Against Patched Visual Prompt Injectors17 May
  4. 2024Unbridled Icarus: A Survey of the Potential Perils of Image Inputs in Multimodal Large Language Model Security8 Apr
  5. 2024Images are Achilles' Heel of Alignment: Exploiting Visual Vulnerabilities for Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models14 Mar
  6. 2024Robust CLIP: Unsupervised Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Vision Embeddings for Robust Large Vision-Language Models19 Feb
  7. 2023Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models19 Nov
  8. 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Prompts9 Nov
  9. 2023Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Models26 Jul
  10. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models22 Jun
  11. 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models26 May
  12. 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Models19 Jun

Other references · 33

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  6. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  7. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  8. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  9. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  10. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  11. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  12. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
21 more
  1. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
  2. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  3. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  4. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  5. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,573
  6. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  7. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  8. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  9. 2023MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilitiescited by 1,221
  10. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,033
  11. 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 702
  12. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  13. 2023CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agentscited by 692
  14. 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 485
  15. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 469
  16. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
  17. 2022Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoningcited by 347
  18. 2019A Short Note on the Kinetics-700 Human Action Datasetcited by 308
  19. 2024Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language Modelscited by 160
  20. 2020RareAct: A video dataset of unusual interactionscited by 23
  21. 2024UI-JEPA: Towards Active Perception of User Intent through Onscreen User Activitycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Towards Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models: Insights from Design Choices and Prompt Formatting Techniques
  2. 2026Robustness of Vision Language Models Against Split-Image Harmful Input Attacks
  3. 2026Breaking the weakest link to evade vision language models
  4. 2024A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends
  5. 2025Beyond Text: Multimodal Jailbreaking of Vision-Language and Audio Models through Perceptually Simple Transformations
  6. 2025CeTAD: Towards Certified Toxicity-Aware Distance in Vision Language Models
  7. 2025Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Black-Box Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Seeing the Threat: Vulnerabilities in Vision-Language Models to Adversarial Attack