Breaking the weakest link to evade vision language models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Language Models (VLMs) have recently emerged as a critical component of multimodal AI systems, enabling joint reasoning over visual and textual inputs in real-world and safety-critical applications. Despite their growing deployment, the robustness of VLMs against adversarial threats remains insufficiently explored, particularly in the context of evasion attacks targeting multimodal alignment. In this work, we investigate the vulnerability of VLMs to adversarial perturbations applied to visual inputs and study two attack settings: untargeted attacks, where the goal is to disrupt the model's interpretation of the original image, and targeted attacks, where the adversary aims to force the model to generate a specific semantic description unrelated to the original image. To efficiently generate adversarial examples, we propose a gradient-based attack method that performs optimization exclusively on the vision encoder of the VLM rather than on the entire multimodal architecture. This design significantly reduces the computational cost and resource requirements of the attack while maintaining strong effectiveness. We evaluate our approach on several open-source VLMs, including Qwen2.5-VL, Granite-Vision, FastVLM, and Phi-3.5-Vision, and show that small, human-imperceptible perturbations can substantially alter the textual interpretation produced by the models. Our findings highlight the vulnerability of modern VLMs to adversarial manipulation and emphasize the need for improved robustness and security mechanisms in multimodal AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.
Builds on
9 of 11 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Visual Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Driving27 Nov
- 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models22 Jun
- 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models26 May
Other references · 6
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 414
- 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 145
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Multimodal Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models by Leveraging One-To-Many Relationships
- 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Models
- 2024Probing the Robustness of Vision-Language Pretrained Models: A Multimodal Adversarial Attack Approach
- 2024A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends
- 2025Seeing the Threat: Vulnerabilities in Vision-Language Models to Adversarial Attack
- 2024Towards Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models: Insights from Design Choices and Prompt Formatting Techniques
- 2024Chain of Attack: On the Robustness of Vision-Language Models Against Transfer-Based Adversarial Attacks
- 2025Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Black-Box Vision-Language Models