Stage-wise Attention-Guided Region Sequencing for Adversarial Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness
Abstract (arXiv)
Targeted adversarial attacks on Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) test whether small image perturbations can steer model responses toward attacker-specified content. Under the standard L-infinity constraint, targeted attacks become a regional perturbation budget allocation problem: attack success depends not only on the perturbation objective, but also on which regions receive updates and in what order. Existing localized attacks improve over global perturbations but rely on stochastic spatial sampling, often updating weakly influential regions. We address this limitation through an attention-based analysis showing that cross-modal attention identifies adversarially sensitive regions and that perturbing high-attention hotspots induces predictable redistribution toward subsequent salient regions. These findings motivate attention-guided region sequencing, which begins from dominant hotspots and progressively moves the update support toward next-salient regions. Based on these principles, we propose Stage-wise Attention-Guided Attack (SAGA), a black-box region-sequencing framework that uses a fixed attention map from an open-source LVLM to guide perturbation updates without accessing target-model parameters, gradients, or attention maps. Across ten closed-source and open-source LVLMs, SAGA achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates and the best overall imperceptibility. The source code is available at https://github.com/jaehyun-kwak/SAGA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 35 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
35 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 10
Same direction, newest first
- 2025X-Transfer Attacks: Towards Super Transferable Adversarial Attacks on CLIP8 May
- 2025A Frustratingly Simple Yet Highly Effective Attack Baseline: Over 90% Success Rate Against the Strong Black-box Models of GPT-4.5/4o/o113 Mar
- 2025Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models via Shuffle Inconsistency9 Jan
- 2024Defending LVLMs Against Vision Attacks through Partial-Perception Supervision17 Dec
- 2024AnyAttack: Towards Large-scale Self-supervised Adversarial Attacks on Vision-language Models7 Oct
- 2024TrojVLM: Backdoor Attack Against Vision Language Models28 Sep
- 2024Shadowcast: Stealthy Data Poisoning Attacks Against Vision-Language Models5 Feb
- 2023How Robust is Google's Bard to Adversarial Image Attacks?21 Sep
- 2023Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Models26 Jul
- 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models26 May
Other references · 25
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
13 more
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 679
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
- 2024Jailbreaking Attack against Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 128
- 2024Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 115
- 2024Interpreting and Editing Vision-Language Representations to Mitigate Hallucinationscited by 103
- 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences Competitioncited by 96
- 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areascited by 93
- 2024Natural Language Understanding and Inference with MLLM in Visual Question Answering: A Surveycited by 74
- 2019advertorch v0.1: An Adversarial Robustness Toolbox based on PyTorchcited by 69
- 2024What's in the Image? A Deep-Dive into the Vision of Vision Language Modelscited by 66
- 2025Adversarial Attacks against Closed-Source MLLMs via Feature Optimal Alignmentcited by 42
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Enhancing Targeted Adversarial Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models via Intermediate Projector
- 2026Seeing No Evil: Blinding Large Vision-Language Models to Safety Instructions via Adversarial Attention Hijacking
- 2026Attention Hijacking: Response Manipulation Across Queries in Vision-Language Models
- 2024Exploiting Vision Encoder Vulnerabilities for Universal Adversarial Perturbations on Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026Grounding-Driven Attack: Improving Encoder-based Adversarial Transferability against Large Vision-Language Models
- 2024A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends
- 2026PA-Attack: Guiding Gray-Box Attacks on LVLM Vision Encoders with Prototypes and Attention
- 2026SGHA-Attack: Semantic-Guided Hierarchical Alignment for Transferable Targeted Attacks on Vision-Language Models