mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analyzing and Mitigating Model Collapse in Rectified Flow Models

arXiv 2412.08175 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 10

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Training with synthetic data is becoming increasingly inevitable as synthetic content proliferates across the web, driven by the remarkable performance of recent deep generative models. This reliance on synthetic data can also be intentional, as seen in Rectified Flow models, whose Reflow method iteratively uses self-generated data to straighten the flow and improve sampling efficiency. However, recent studies have shown that repeatedly training on self-generated samples can lead to model collapse (MC), where performance degrades over time. Despite this, most recent work on MC either focuses on empirical observations or analyzes regression problems and maximum likelihood objectives, leaving a rigorous theoretical analysis of reflow methods unexplored. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by providing both theoretical analysis and practical solutions for addressing MC in diffusion/flow models. We begin by studying Denoising Autoencoders and prove performance degradation when DAEs are iteratively trained on their own outputs. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to rigorously analyze model collapse in DAEs and, by extension, in diffusion models and Rectified Flow. Our analysis and experiments demonstrate that rectified flow also suffers from MC, leading to potential performance degradation in each reflow step. Additionally, we prove that incorporating real data can prevent MC during recursive DAE training, supporting the recent trend of using real data as an effective approach for mitigating MC. Building on these insights, we propose a novel Real-data Augmented Reflow and a series of improved variants, which seamlessly integrate real data into Reflow training by leveraging reverse flow. Empirical evaluations on standard image benchmarks confirm that RA Reflow effectively mitigates model collapse, preserving high-quality sample generation even with fewer sampling steps.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 27 of its 114 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.

Builds on

27 of 114 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusion1 Oct
  2. 2022Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models with Exponential Integrator29 Apr
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations26 Nov

Other references · 24

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  4. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  5. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  6. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  7. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  8. 2021SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 1,903
  9. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 964
  10. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 835
  11. 2020WaveGrad: Estimating Gradients for Waveform Generationcited by 620
  12. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 343
12 more
  1. 2022Rectified Flow: A Marginal Preserving Approach to Optimal Transportcited by 277
  2. 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplingscited by 267
  3. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 239
  4. 2023Flow Matching in Latent Spacecited by 155
  5. 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 143
  6. 2024Improving the Training of Rectified Flowscited by 106
  7. 2024Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistencycited by 101
  8. 2023On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Datacited by 98
  9. 2024Strong Model Collapsecited by 62
  10. 2023Exact Diffusion Inversion via Bi-directional Integration Approximationcited by 43
  11. 2023Combining Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet: Heading towards Evolution or Degradation?cited by 41
  12. 2024Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Modelscited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Escaping Model Collapse via Synthetic Data Verification: Near-term Improvements and Long-term Convergence
  2. 2026Feature Selective Model Collapse in Diffusion Models: Total Replacement versus Fixed-Budget Training
  3. 2024Simple ReFlow: Improved Techniques for Fast Flow Models
  4. 2024Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World
  5. 2025A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops
  6. 2025Stabilizing Self-Consuming Diffusion Models with Latent Space Filtering
  7. 2024Rectified Diffusion: Straightness Is Not Your Need in Rectified Flow
  8. 2025Decoupled MeanFlow: Turning Flow Models into Flow Maps for Accelerated Sampling