mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Perceptual Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks for CNN-based Image Classification

arXiv 1906.00204 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2019cs.LG cs.CR cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have recently achieved state-of-the-art performance and provide significant progress in many machine learning tasks, such as image classification, speech processing, natural language processing, etc. However, recent studies have shown that DNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. For instance, in the image classification domain, adding small imperceptible perturbations to the input image is sufficient to fool the DNN and to cause misclassification. The perturbed image, called textitadversarial example, should be visually as close as possible to the original image. However, all the works proposed in the literature for generating adversarial examples have used the Lp norms (L0, L2 and L∞) as distance metrics to quantify the similarity between the original image and the adversarial example. Nonetheless, the Lp norms do not correlate with human judgment, making them not suitable to reliably assess the perceptual similarity/fidelity of adversarial examples. In this paper, we present a database for visual fidelity assessment of adversarial examples. We describe the creation of the database and evaluate the performance of fifteen state-of-the-art full-reference (FR) image fidelity assessment metrics that could substitute Lp norms. The database as well as subjective scores are publicly available to help designing new metrics for adversarial examples and to facilitate future research works.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.